FYI: request backports for 8239091, 8238942, 8224109 and 8214481

[Mario Torre]

Thanks!

Cheers,
Mario

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:58 PM Langer, Christoph
<christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mario,
>
> I think all of these fixes are good for backporting to JDK11 Updates. So they are approved now.
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Freitag, 3. April 2020 15:03
> > To: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>; Langer, Christoph
> > <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > Subject: FYI: request backports for 8239091, 8238942, 8224109 and 8214481
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I marked the bugs in $subject for backport in 11u-dev, they are kind
> > of related so I would like to backport the full batch in one go if
> > approved.
> >
> > I'm still thinking if it's a good idea to backport them to 8 too, the
> > bugs are present though so I may as well do it, but I'll send a
> > separate mail for this.
> >
> > There is another reason I send this email though, 8214481 and 8224109
> > do affect rendering. 8214481 seems mostly harmless but 8224109 does
> > change the result of the affine transform. The current transform is
> > wrong though, so I would expect that the ones who noticed would be
> > happy about getting a fix but if they have workarounds in their code
> > it will invalidate those, so I understand if we want to only ship
> > those fixes in a major version and not in an update.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mario
> >
> > --
> > Mario Torre
> > Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> > Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
> > 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
>


-- 
Mario Torre
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898