[7u] Request for approve for CR 8015976 OpenJDK part of bug JDK-8015812 [TEST_BUG] Tests have conflicting test descriptions

[Konstantin Shefov]

There are a lot of test pairs (.java + .html) in JDK repo where both 
files contain jtreg tags, although only one file contains @test tag.
I think it is not necessary to remove other tags, because they show that 
the given file is a part of the given test for @bug and its author, etc.

Konstantin
On 06-Jun-13 18:18, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
> I didn't look into sources of jtreg stuff!
> Basically, I understand that our test is either one or
> several files, and only one of them should have @test tag inside.
> Simplest example, .java and .html pair for running in appletviewer:
> @test should be in .html only.
>
> Now, I always thought that a line with 'test' (without @)
> was harmless and mean nothing, and so might be removed.
> If not, well, I don't like annotation keywords without prefix:-)
>
> -yan
>
> On 06/06/2013 05:30 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>> Yuri, what do you think about it?
>> -Konstantin
>>
>> On 06-Jun-13 17:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2013 14:26, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>> No, it is not necessary
>>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing something but when you remove the @test then aren't
>>> the rest of the tags orphaned?
>>>
>>> -Alan.
>>>
>>
>