From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov  1 11:10:13 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:10:13 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval: JDK-8213154: Update
 copyright headers of files in src tree that are missing Classpath exception
In-Reply-To: <CAKZz+gcu8KY5043TmhXpLzrKUFhGA1DLOzKi2gKqcDBNbBY9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKZz+gcu8KY5043TmhXpLzrKUFhGA1DLOzKi2gKqcDBNbBY9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P63Bu9OWP2VRN7oWZ7n+OQbpjEEoOD6_nM4PsWB9+prXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 18:03, Martin Balao <mbalao at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I have a review for the JDK-8 backport of JDK-8213154 ?
>
>  *
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.00.jdk8u/
>  *
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.00.jdk8u.zip
>
> Thanks,
> Martin.-
>
> --
> [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213154

Adding the missing Classpath exception looks fine, but there is no need to add
"All rights reserved" to an RH copyright. Even the "affiliates" part
is superfluous.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From mbalao at redhat.com  Thu Nov  1 15:37:14 2018
From: mbalao at redhat.com (Martin Balao)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:37:14 -0300
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval: JDK-8213154: Update
 copyright headers of files in src tree that are missing Classpath exception
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P63Bu9OWP2VRN7oWZ7n+OQbpjEEoOD6_nM4PsWB9+prXw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKZz+gcu8KY5043TmhXpLzrKUFhGA1DLOzKi2gKqcDBNbBY9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P63Bu9OWP2VRN7oWZ7n+OQbpjEEoOD6_nM4PsWB9+prXw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKZz+gfZm54VaZwrb2yy9mkpHtrgW0CZrB1TSSKRdoU77bSZug@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for having a look at this.

Webrev.01 without "All rights reserved" and "affiliates" parts:

 *
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk8u/
 *
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk8u.zip

Are you okay to go?

Kind regards,
Martin.-

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 18:03, Martin Balao <mbalao at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can I have a review for the JDK-8 backport of JDK-8213154 ?
> >
> >  *
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/
> 8213154.webrev.00.jdk8u/
> >  *
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/
> 8213154.webrev.00.jdk8u.zip
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin.-
> >
> > --
> > [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213154
>
> Adding the missing Classpath exception looks fine, but there is no need to
> add
> "All rights reserved" to an RH copyright. Even the "affiliates" part
> is superfluous.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>

From ramanand.patil at oracle.com  Fri Nov  2 10:18:23 2018
From: ramanand.patil at oracle.com (Ramanand Patil)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 03:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval: Backport of 8213085: (tz) Upgrade
 time-zone data to tzdata2018g
Message-ID: <40ba6f12-0ed0-46d1-97dd-9b36e18c6793@default>

Hi,
Please approve the backport of 8213085 to 8u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213085
JDK12 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/c9bbf33fd1ae
JDK12 Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-October/056304.html

Changes apply cleanly to jdk8u-dev after path reshuffling.

Regards,
Ramanand.

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Fri Nov  2 18:37:27 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:37:27 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval: JDK-8213154: Update
 copyright headers of files in src tree that are missing Classpath exception
In-Reply-To: <CAKZz+gfZm54VaZwrb2yy9mkpHtrgW0CZrB1TSSKRdoU77bSZug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKZz+gcu8KY5043TmhXpLzrKUFhGA1DLOzKi2gKqcDBNbBY9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P63Bu9OWP2VRN7oWZ7n+OQbpjEEoOD6_nM4PsWB9+prXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKZz+gfZm54VaZwrb2yy9mkpHtrgW0CZrB1TSSKRdoU77bSZug@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P40ncRCRWEOp-QudpVAjRJjb2EzwfH7EfWMJWXKVrDjBg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 15:37, Martin Balao <mbalao at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for having a look at this.
>
> Webrev.01 without "All rights reserved" and "affiliates" parts:
>
>  * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk8u/
>  * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8213154/8213154.webrev.01.jdk8u.zip
>
> Are you okay to go?
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin.-
>

Looks good.

Let me know once this has approval and I can do the push for you.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From valerie.peng at oracle.com  Tue Nov  6 02:13:05 2018
From: valerie.peng at oracle.com (Valerie Peng)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:13:05 -0800
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for CR JDK-8029661
 - Support TLS v1.2 algorithm in SunPKCS11 provider
In-Reply-To: <CAKZz+geiMOCqhjeZacN=GjREkwf5L9_mPRYq_F-EBE7NDxC-ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKZz+gdbNA7q6me0HNs2gYzfBDEAGuwcwVHq3DAjowxGuBCc1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <235a8819-2870-dfc9-09ce-9d8be7d68ce6@oracle.com>
 <CAKZz+geNuGRpa2pX0i=CP01SS3PSyncf+NrbDcO6TJ5wK-DBwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e0005ffd-de3a-164b-0204-0c32bb983afe@oracle.com>
 <CAKZz+gfOw92sqwrzFX5OQC+bckKF7Mw+-SkHujJ3F5fZf5T0dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P6Z0ZuD==g7N2B_6gMS479OjB-Y-bVm5e_84Tvt_n7yAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKZz+geiMOCqhjeZacN=GjREkwf5L9_mPRYq_F-EBE7NDxC-ew@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <21440870-605d-35f7-bf60-62f219444280@oracle.com>

Let me validate your patch with a mach5 job.

Testing on only 1 platform with only sun/security/pkcs11 test suite is a 
bit lacking comparing to our general testing requirement before 
integrating the changes.

Thanks,
Valerie

On 10/31/2018 1:13 PM, Martin Balao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com 
> <mailto:gnu.andrew at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Having 8029661 be that fix alone on 12, but 8029661+8210912 on
>     8u is confusing.? I can understand the desire to pair them, given
>     we know 8029661 breaks the build without the other change, but
>     at the very least, it should be mentioned in the commit message,
>     so it shows up in searches. It doesn't appear to be at present.
>
>
> That's right, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Webrev.12:
>
> ?* 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u/>
> ?* 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u.zip 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u.zip> 
>
>
> @Valerie: are you okay to go now?
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin.-


From hohensee at amazon.com  Thu Nov  8 00:24:03 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 00:24:03 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev]: RFA: 8208480: Test failure: assert(is_bound() ||
 is_unused()) after JDK-8206075 in C1
Message-ID: <D3837835-F687-49A2-BEA1-BC167638C686@amazon.com>

Please approve the backport to jdk8u of this patch for the backport of

8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels used as branch targets

requested in a previous email.

JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208480
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8208480/webrev.8u.00/
Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-August/029627.html

The patch applies cleanly net of line number changes and file locations.

Webrev combined with 8206075: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8208480/webrev.8u.8206075.combined/

Thanks,

Paul


From hohensee at amazon.com  Thu Nov  8 00:24:00 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 00:24:00 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev] RFA: 8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels
 used as branch targets
Message-ID: <1C2C0FE7-F3D2-41F6-B6E2-E058FE21EA83@amazon.com>

Please approve this small backport to jdk8u. The original patch had a bug that was fixed by
8208480: Fix for test failure: assert(is_bound() || is_unused()) after JDK-8206075 in C1
for which a backport request immediately follows this one.
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.00/
Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-July/029136.html

The patch applies cleanly net of line number changes and file locations.

Webrev combined with 8208480: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.8208480.combined/

Thanks,

Paul


From hohensee at amazon.com  Thu Nov  8 00:29:30 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 00:29:30 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev] RFA: 8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels
 used as branch targets
In-Reply-To: <1C2C0FE7-F3D2-41F6-B6E2-E058FE21EA83@amazon.com>
References: <1C2C0FE7-F3D2-41F6-B6E2-E058FE21EA83@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <E68CD744-C00B-4494-A233-A1A20BD27AD2@amazon.com>

Email is asynchronous and this message lost the race. :)

?On 11/7/18, 4:25 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:

    Please approve this small backport to jdk8u. The original patch had a bug that was fixed by
    8208480: Fix for test failure: assert(is_bound() || is_unused()) after JDK-8206075 in C1
    for which a backport request immediately follows this one.
    JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075
    Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.00/
    Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-July/029136.html
    
    The patch applies cleanly net of line number changes and file locations.
    
    Webrev combined with 8208480: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.8208480.combined/
    
    Thanks,
    
    Paul
    
    


From mbalao at redhat.com  Thu Nov  8 20:37:35 2018
From: mbalao at redhat.com (Martin Balao)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:37:35 -0300
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval: JDK-8213154: Update
 copyright headers of files in src tree that are missing Classpath exception
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P40ncRCRWEOp-QudpVAjRJjb2EzwfH7EfWMJWXKVrDjBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKZz+gcu8KY5043TmhXpLzrKUFhGA1DLOzKi2gKqcDBNbBY9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P63Bu9OWP2VRN7oWZ7n+OQbpjEEoOD6_nM4PsWB9+prXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKZz+gfZm54VaZwrb2yy9mkpHtrgW0CZrB1TSSKRdoU77bSZug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P40ncRCRWEOp-QudpVAjRJjb2EzwfH7EfWMJWXKVrDjBg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKZz+gdxEsGRqCJQhmpwq8cujRdw_6=UsG6fWLgtZZ=z=HYpcA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sean,

Are you okay to go with this one?

Thanks,
Martin.-

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good.
>
> Let me know once this has approval and I can do the push for you.
>

From deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com  Fri Nov  9 04:55:20 2018
From: deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com (Deepak Kejriwal)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:55:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 : Era.getDisplayName
 doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
In-Reply-To: <1e9752c6-7aa4-4895-bd69-a9a76b5eb826@default>
References: <1e9752c6-7aa4-4895-bd69-a9a76b5eb826@default>
Message-ID: <8eb8192c-7753-4385-aa0a-b573c46f263a@default>

Hi,

 

Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.

 

Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049

Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/

JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html

 

 

Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312

Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html

 

Summary:

 

The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  

.         All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 

.         Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly

 

All the related testing is done and is a pass.

 

Regards,

Deepak

 

From david.buck at oracle.com  Fri Nov  9 08:26:03 2018
From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:26:03 +0900
Subject: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 :
 Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
In-Reply-To: <8eb8192c-7753-4385-aa0a-b573c46f263a@default>
References: <1e9752c6-7aa4-4895-bd69-a9a76b5eb826@default>
 <8eb8192c-7753-4385-aa0a-b573c46f263a@default>
Message-ID: <CC75EA08-556E-4528-8F7F-FB5C06853FD1@oracle.com>

HI Deepak,

This looks like a different fix:

> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312

Cheers,
-Buck

> On Nov 9, 2018, at 13:55, Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.
> 
> 
> 
> Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
> 
> Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
> 
> JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
> 
> Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html
> 
> 
> 
> Summary:
> 
> 
> 
> The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  
> 
> .         All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 
> 
> .         Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly
> 
> 
> 
> All the related testing is done and is a pass.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Deepak
> 
> 


From david.buck at oracle.com  Fri Nov  9 08:38:30 2018
From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:38:30 +0900
Subject: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 :
 Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
In-Reply-To: <0a75e1b5-f93a-4c78-8d16-6f28ee1ae8e3@default>
References: <1e9752c6-7aa4-4895-bd69-a9a76b5eb826@default>
 <8eb8192c-7753-4385-aa0a-b573c46f263a@default>
 <CC75EA08-556E-4528-8F7F-FB5C06853FD1@oracle.com>
 <0a75e1b5-f93a-4c78-8d16-6f28ee1ae8e3@default>
Message-ID: <5FC24FF5-2796-4B3E-B073-875C1B535953@oracle.com>

approved

Cheers,
-Buck

> On Nov 9, 2018, at 17:41, Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> Sorry, I specified change wrong change set url for master bug. Correcting the change set url for master bug.
> 
> Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.
> 
> Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
> Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
> JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html
> 
> 
> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/965d4dde0086
> Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  
> 	. All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 
> 	. Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly
> 
> All the related testing is done and is a pass.
> 
> Regards,
> Deepak
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Buck 
> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 1:56 PM
> To: Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>
> Cc: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 : Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
> 
> HI Deepak,
> 
> This looks like a different fix:
> 
>> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
> 
> Cheers,
> -Buck
> 
>> On Nov 9, 2018, at 13:55, Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
>> 
>> Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
>> 
>> JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
>> 
>> Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Summary:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  
>> 
>> .         All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 
>> 
>> .         Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> All the related testing is done and is a pass.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Deepak
>> 
>> 
> 


From deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com  Fri Nov  9 08:41:26 2018
From: deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com (Deepak Kejriwal)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 00:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 :
 Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
In-Reply-To: <CC75EA08-556E-4528-8F7F-FB5C06853FD1@oracle.com>
References: <1e9752c6-7aa4-4895-bd69-a9a76b5eb826@default>
 <8eb8192c-7753-4385-aa0a-b573c46f263a@default>
 <CC75EA08-556E-4528-8F7F-FB5C06853FD1@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <0a75e1b5-f93a-4c78-8d16-6f28ee1ae8e3@default>

Hi David,

Sorry, I specified change wrong change set url for master bug. Correcting the change set url for master bug.

Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.

Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html


Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/965d4dde0086
Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html

Summary:

The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  
	. All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 
	. Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly

All the related testing is done and is a pass.

Regards,
Deepak


-----Original Message-----
From: David Buck 
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 1:56 PM
To: Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>
Cc: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 : Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology

HI Deepak,

This looks like a different fix:

> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312

Cheers,
-Buck

> On Nov 9, 2018, at 13:55, Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.
> 
> 
> 
> Master bug :  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
> 
> Webrev for [8u-dev]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
> 
> JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
> 
> Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html
> 
> 
> 
> Summary:
> 
> 
> 
> The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-  
> 
> .         All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test. 
> 
> .         Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly
> 
> 
> 
> All the related testing is done and is a pass.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Deepak
> 
> 


From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Fri Nov  9 15:55:57 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:55:57 +0000
Subject: [8u] Request for Approval for JDK-8197429: Increased stack guard
 causes segfaults on x86-32
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7BTKibP+cewHnHfsBuXoBCuf6hVkCbDGk8WaZ1NQ7j+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7BTKibP+cewHnHfsBuXoBCuf6hVkCbDGk8WaZ1NQ7j+g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P6GOgB22amwiMhF+4HDs6Z=cr0+MC7=ubtn6hHMgmd7cA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 19:45, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197429
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk8/8197429/webrev.01/
> Original review thread:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-February/030076.html
> 8u review thread:
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-July/007647.html
> Reviewed for 8u by Andrew Haley
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Ping? Can someone approve this please?

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From valerie.peng at oracle.com  Fri Nov  9 21:45:05 2018
From: valerie.peng at oracle.com (Valerie Peng)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:45:05 -0800
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for CR JDK-8029661
 - Support TLS v1.2 algorithm in SunPKCS11 provider
In-Reply-To: <21440870-605d-35f7-bf60-62f219444280@oracle.com>
References: <CAKZz+gdbNA7q6me0HNs2gYzfBDEAGuwcwVHq3DAjowxGuBCc1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <235a8819-2870-dfc9-09ce-9d8be7d68ce6@oracle.com>
 <CAKZz+geNuGRpa2pX0i=CP01SS3PSyncf+NrbDcO6TJ5wK-DBwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e0005ffd-de3a-164b-0204-0c32bb983afe@oracle.com>
 <CAKZz+gfOw92sqwrzFX5OQC+bckKF7Mw+-SkHujJ3F5fZf5T0dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABi63P6Z0ZuD==g7N2B_6gMS479OjB-Y-bVm5e_84Tvt_n7yAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKZz+geiMOCqhjeZacN=GjREkwf5L9_mPRYq_F-EBE7NDxC-ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <21440870-605d-35f7-bf60-62f219444280@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5a6e0145-4c86-ba19-f28c-04d5643e7fb6@oracle.com>


Thanks Sean Coffey for helping verifying the 8u backport.
Please go ahead with 8u integration.
Regards,
Valerie

On 11/5/2018 6:13 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Let me validate your patch with a mach5 job.
>
> Testing on only 1 platform with only sun/security/pkcs11 test suite is 
> a bit lacking comparing to our general testing requirement before 
> integrating the changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Valerie
>
> On 10/31/2018 1:13 PM, Martin Balao wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:gnu.andrew at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ??? Having 8029661 be that fix alone on 12, but 8029661+8210912 on
>> ??? 8u is confusing.? I can understand the desire to pair them, given
>> ??? we know 8029661 breaks the build without the other change, but
>> ??? at the very least, it should be mentioned in the commit message,
>> ??? so it shows up in searches. It doesn't appear to be at present.
>>
>>
>> That's right, thanks for pointing this out.
>>
>> Webrev.12:
>>
>> ?* 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u/> 
>>
>> ?* 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u.zip 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embalao/webrevs/8029661/8029661.webrev.12.jdk8u.zip> 
>>
>>
>> @Valerie: are you okay to go now?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Martin.-
>


From aph at redhat.com  Mon Nov 12 17:44:39 2018
From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:44:39 +0000
Subject: So you want to be a future JDK 8u contributor...
Message-ID: <e58c2183-6493-6abc-d30e-24670b70adb8@redhat.com>

Several people have contacted me recently to talk about working on the
future jdk8u project after Oracle relinquishes their leadership. I'm
very encouraged by this: if we do it right it'll be an excellent
example of an Open Source project. As much as possible I'd like to see
the project run in an open and transparent way.

However, I will say that if you want to contribute, please don't wait
until that time. We -- the community -- will be very busy taking over
the project and won't have much bandwidth to sponsor your patches if
you don't have commit access.

So, it would be an excellent idea to get involved with OpenJDK now. If
you're already a jdk8u committer or reviewer, that's fine. If you're
already an OpenJDK but not jdk8u committer, great: get someone to
propose you as a jdk8u committer. If you're not an OpenJDK committer
at all, this would be a good time to submit some patches and get
committer status.

Above all, thank you in advance to everyone who'll be working on
jdk8u. I think we can make a real success of this, for a long time to
come.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 05:22:43 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:22:43 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P7KHiijCGz+LG5pXBUM+u593+6DfOBTSwxc8LZ9hQrrew@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 05:22, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
>
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
>
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Vote: Yes.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 05:22:12 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:22:12 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
Message-ID: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>

I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.

While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
[1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
technical qualification.

Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.

Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
to vote on
this nomination.
Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.

For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].

[0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
[3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From david.buck at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 05:31:55 2018
From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:31:55 +0900
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <83ef7316-dd2c-35b8-5df5-bdc2f6d76784@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

Cheers,
-Buck

On 2018/11/13 14:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

From david.holmes at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 05:39:04 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:39:04 +1000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <23c64894-684f-1710-2201-a97937554a9b@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

David

On 13/11/2018 3:22 pm, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 06:10:13 2018
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:10:13 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87aa4d4c-5fc5-6b96-5ec3-780521abe32f@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/12/18 9:22 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

From tobias.hartmann at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 06:51:54 2018
From: tobias.hartmann at oracle.com (Tobias Hartmann)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:51:54 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ecfa17a9-5f3d-4a0d-9212-2c19707a3983@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 13.11.18 06:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

From serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 07:29:49 2018
From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com (serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 23:29:49 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <eaa1349f-07cf-c304-e2c9-3bc8667e04af@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 08:25:29 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:25:29 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <58e7ba73cfa3f62e69521e56d552be894739c755.camel@redhat.com>

Vote: yes


From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Tue Nov 13 08:30:25 2018
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:30:25 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh13qbvT0z4-01bX4QbVXEnOaKTRm_SdJqVBT3AXYZbyL1g@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:23 AM Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
>
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
>
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From james.laskey at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 08:33:57 2018
From: james.laskey at oracle.com (James Laskey)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:33:57 -0400
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B4527AAA-AD40-4AC9-9204-F73417708E9E@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 13, 2018, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> -- 
> Andrew :)
> 
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> 
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


From daniel.fuchs at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 10:41:55 2018
From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com (Daniel Fuchs)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:41:55 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9148233f-5a86-54f7-9aac-a28f3404ba9f@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

best regards,

-- daniel

On 13/11/2018 05:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.


From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Tue Nov 13 10:58:11 2018
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:58:11 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaQpqE0RTb=PKuSh9NnWdvOWDdUVuLQW790ntmJ_d-30pw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: Yes.

Cheers,
Mario
Il giorno mar 13 nov 2018 alle ore 06:24 Andrew Hughes
<gnu.andrew at redhat.com> ha scritto:
>
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
>
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
>
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From chris.hegarty at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 11:11:06 2018
From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:11:06 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <94971BDC-5851-4E16-B8CB-6C39A325E508@oracle.com>


> On 13 Nov 2018, at 05:22, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.

Vote: YES

-Chris.

From shade at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 11:37:39 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:37:39 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <91c34464-f7b8-b6d0-da20-e0b8c590bdca@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/13/2018 06:22 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 



From poonam.bajaj at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 13:22:34 2018
From: poonam.bajaj at oracle.com (Poonam Parhar)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:22:34 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7e37c06a-2dea-4eed-c91d-322bef0ab5c2@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

-Poonam


On 11/12/18 9:22 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
>
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
>
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote


From zgu at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 13:32:12 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:32:12 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1b19c5c0-9c1c-1618-dcc7-e2071cb7fc98@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

-Zhengyu

On 11/13/18 12:22 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

From thomas.schatzl at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 13:33:17 2018
From: thomas.schatzl at oracle.com (Thomas Schatzl)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:33:17 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e77dc0cb56a8ad57475b2e4ea63dc112499b92e3.camel@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 05:22 +0000, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are
> eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] 
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge(
> )
> [1] 
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge(
> )
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote



From Roger.Riggs at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 14:18:16 2018
From: Roger.Riggs at oracle.com (Roger Riggs)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:18:16 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bd717c33-6ad9-9c39-0e41-ec86b77390fa@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/13/2018 12:22 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.


From aph at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 17:10:22 2018
From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:10:22 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cd978380-13cd-cbc3-d328-380cf6b0108c@redhat.com>

On 11/13/18 5:22 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.

Vote: yes

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

From jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 17:15:38 2018
From: jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com (jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:15:38 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297B720-C35F-4228-9989-8FF4081FC5EF@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes
/Jesper

> On 13 Nov 2018, at 06:22, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> 
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
> 
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> -- 
> Andrew :)
> 
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> 
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


From hohensee at amazon.com  Wed Nov 14 06:30:34 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:30:34 +0000
Subject: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8700C662-6D9A-4351-8EDF-8033B884CAD0@amazon.com>

Vote:yes.

?On 11/13/18, 6:24 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Hughes" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

    I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
    
    While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
    [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
    OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
    Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
    OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
    not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
    technical qualification.
    
    Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
    
    Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
    to vote on
    this nomination.
    Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
    
    For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
    
    [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
    [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
    -- 
    Andrew :)
    
    Senior Free Java Software Engineer
    Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
    
    Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
    PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
    Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
    


From hohensee at amazon.com  Wed Nov 14 06:43:31 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:43:31 +0000
Subject: So you want to be a future JDK 8u contributor...
In-Reply-To: <e58c2183-6493-6abc-d30e-24670b70adb8@redhat.com>
References: <e58c2183-6493-6abc-d30e-24670b70adb8@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <955AC9FB-5B0D-49A7-A590-B12D61EE0DA1@amazon.com>

+1, Andrew. I'm already in for jdk8u support, and would be happy to sponsor others.

Paul

?On 11/12/18, 6:45 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Haley" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of aph at redhat.com> wrote:

    Several people have contacted me recently to talk about working on the
    future jdk8u project after Oracle relinquishes their leadership. I'm
    very encouraged by this: if we do it right it'll be an excellent
    example of an Open Source project. As much as possible I'd like to see
    the project run in an open and transparent way.
    
    However, I will say that if you want to contribute, please don't wait
    until that time. We -- the community -- will be very busy taking over
    the project and won't have much bandwidth to sponsor your patches if
    you don't have commit access.
    
    So, it would be an excellent idea to get involved with OpenJDK now. If
    you're already a jdk8u committer or reviewer, that's fine. If you're
    already an OpenJDK but not jdk8u committer, great: get someone to
    propose you as a jdk8u committer. If you're not an OpenJDK committer
    at all, this would be a good time to submit some patches and get
    committer status.
    
    Above all, thank you in advance to everyone who'll be working on
    jdk8u. I think we can make a real success of this, for a long time to
    come.
    
    -- 
    Andrew Haley
    Java Platform Lead Engineer
    Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
    EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
    


From martijnverburg at gmail.com  Wed Nov 14 11:27:29 2018
From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:27:29 +0000
Subject: So you want to be a future JDK 8u contributor...
In-Reply-To: <955AC9FB-5B0D-49A7-A590-B12D61EE0DA1@amazon.com>
References: <e58c2183-6493-6abc-d30e-24670b70adb8@redhat.com>
 <955AC9FB-5B0D-49A7-A590-B12D61EE0DA1@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <CAP7YuAQZvcug8PuWBO=pMQr-u7=mk-=WcLJ=gyvdMvmX54bcNQ@mail.gmail.com>

Great!  JClarity will do some digging to see if there are some small issues
we can get started with.  I assume it?s still the policy of fix in jdk/jdk
first and discuss/show a separate backport issue/patch here?


Cheers,
Martijn

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 06:44, Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:

> +1, Andrew. I'm already in for jdk8u support, and would be happy to
> sponsor others.
>
> Paul
>
> ?On 11/12/18, 6:45 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Haley" <
> jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>     Several people have contacted me recently to talk about working on the
>     future jdk8u project after Oracle relinquishes their leadership. I'm
>     very encouraged by this: if we do it right it'll be an excellent
>     example of an Open Source project. As much as possible I'd like to see
>     the project run in an open and transparent way.
>
>     However, I will say that if you want to contribute, please don't wait
>     until that time. We -- the community -- will be very busy taking over
>     the project and won't have much bandwidth to sponsor your patches if
>     you don't have commit access.
>
>     So, it would be an excellent idea to get involved with OpenJDK now. If
>     you're already a jdk8u committer or reviewer, that's fine. If you're
>     already an OpenJDK but not jdk8u committer, great: get someone to
>     propose you as a jdk8u committer. If you're not an OpenJDK committer
>     at all, this would be a good time to submit some patches and get
>     committer status.
>
>     Above all, thank you in advance to everyone who'll be working on
>     jdk8u. I think we can make a real success of this, for a long time to
>     come.
>
>     --
>     Andrew Haley
>     Java Platform Lead Engineer
>     Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
>     EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
>
>
> --
Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)

From aph at redhat.com  Wed Nov 14 11:30:16 2018
From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:30:16 +0000
Subject: So you want to be a future JDK 8u contributor...
In-Reply-To: <CAP7YuAQZvcug8PuWBO=pMQr-u7=mk-=WcLJ=gyvdMvmX54bcNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e58c2183-6493-6abc-d30e-24670b70adb8@redhat.com>
 <955AC9FB-5B0D-49A7-A590-B12D61EE0DA1@amazon.com>
 <CAP7YuAQZvcug8PuWBO=pMQr-u7=mk-=WcLJ=gyvdMvmX54bcNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d4038e87-2e06-50da-c77f-b24e7b6294f0@redhat.com>

On 11/14/18 11:27 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Great!  JClarity will do some digging to see if there are some small issues
> we can get started with.  I assume it?s still the policy of fix in jdk/jdk
> first and discuss/show a separate backport issue/patch here?

Certainly. Life is confusing enough as it is already without some bugs fixed
in 8u but not later releases. :-)

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

From muthusamy.chinnathambi at oracle.com  Thu Nov 15 10:00:29 2018
From: muthusamy.chinnathambi at oracle.com (Muthusamy Chinnathambi)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 02:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for CR
 JDK-8027434: "-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError" uses fork instead of vfork
In-Reply-To: <e3f91b98-603d-5617-843b-cf432dd46cc6@oracle.com>
References: <f1aa1b28-0d48-4a14-9033-daf84d2432c1@default>
 <130ab045-f422-1dc3-d0ae-ae5a515487e4@oracle.com>
 <e3f91b98-603d-5617-843b-cf432dd46cc6@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <e63c48cc-cd8e-4c11-b62a-660ba8e32624@default>

Hi Sean,

Missed pinging on this one.
Yes, this has been fixed in the 11 update release.

Regards,
Muthusamy C

-----Original Message-----
From: David Holmes 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:24 PM
To: Se?n Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>; Muthusamy Chinnathambi <muthusamy.chinnathambi at oracle.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for CR JDK-8027434: "-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError" uses fork instead of vfork

Hi Sean,

On 17/10/2018 9:44 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> Muthusamy,
> 
> please look at fixing this in the 11 Updates release first. Also, can 
> you check with hotspot engineers around the suitability of this fix in 
> an update release ?

This is a very simple fix that only impacts users of 
-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError. I have no concerns about it going into any 
update release.

Thanks,
David

> Regards,
> Sean.
> 
> On 17/10/18 12:26, Muthusamy Chinnathambi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I get the approval of enhancement backport of 'JDK-8027434: 
>> "-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError" uses fork instead of vfork' to jdk8u-dev.
>>
>> Jdk12 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027434
>>
>> Short description of the change:
>> When the system does not have enough memory available to fork, the 
>> option "-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError" may not work. Even a simple command 
>> "kill" does not get executed. This change is to use vfork instead of 
>> fork during "OnOutOfMemoryError".
>>
>> I have tested it with the jprt and jtreg tests.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Muthusamy C
> 

From vaibhav.x.choudhary at oracle.com  Thu Nov 15 10:42:51 2018
From: vaibhav.x.choudhary at oracle.com (Vaibhav Choudhary)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:12:51 +0530
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval: Backport of 8055814: [TESTBUG]
 runtime/NMT/NMTWithCDS.java fails with product builds due to missing
 UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
Message-ID: <6D12CE5D-BF12-4F24-9AB2-C9DA786245C9@oracle.com>

Hi,

Please approve the backport of 8055814 to 8u-dev
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055814
JDK9 Changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/b5c908c4e997
JDK9 Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2014-August/012369.html

Changes apply cleaning. 

Description: 
We need to add -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions for this CDS test to run properly.


Thanks,
Vaibhav C




From rasbold at google.com  Thu Nov 15 19:37:44 2018
From: rasbold at google.com (Chuck Rasbold)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:37:44 -0800
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
Message-ID: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>

I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
Committer.

Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
"Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
changes.
His list of contributions can be found here [3].

Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.

Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
on this nomination.
Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.

For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].

Chuck Rasbold

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
[3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
=(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)

From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Fri Nov 16 08:06:26 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:06:26 +0100
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <64a23b3709c701eab09ae457c61e10eac3a2ae99.camel@redhat.com>

Vote: yes


From adinn at redhat.com  Fri Nov 16 09:58:17 2018
From: adinn at redhat.com (Andrew Dinn)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:58:17 +0000
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9b66eb3d-556d-14d2-579f-9d8a36f6b32d@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

On 15/11/2018 19:37, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
> 
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
> 
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
> 
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
> 
> Chuck Rasbold
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
> 

-- 
regards,


Andrew Dinn
-----------
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander

From zgu at redhat.com  Fri Nov 16 13:21:42 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:21:42 -0500
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <37e99ef0-f22a-4d88-03f3-74f80dfa2e11@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

-Zhengyu

On 11/15/18 2:37 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
> 
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
> 
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
> 
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
> 
> Chuck Rasbold
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
> 

From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Fri Nov 16 16:13:27 2018
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:13:27 -0800
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8050d086-d0bc-6729-513d-58c2f4c1962c@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/15/18 11:37 AM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
> 
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
> 
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
> 
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
> 
> Chuck Rasbold
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
> 

From martinrb at google.com  Fri Nov 16 16:58:51 2018
From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:58:51 -0800
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+kOe0-JzvhLRg4kkuar5mh4XJoi8AJCYfm3AFMPWAErWU-ENQ@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Chuck Rasbold <rasbold at google.com> wrote:

> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
>
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
>
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
>
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
>
> Chuck Rasbold
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
>

From serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com  Fri Nov 16 17:49:12 2018
From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com (serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:49:12 -0800
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6e30c72f-81bb-eb97-6a40-637880a28a55@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

From karen.kinnear at oracle.com  Fri Nov 16 17:57:42 2018
From: karen.kinnear at oracle.com (Karen Kinnear)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:57:42 -0500
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <89EBA583-B4B0-4FC2-BBE2-661F4BACB49F@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

thanks,
Karen

> On Nov 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Chuck Rasbold <rasbold at google.com> wrote:
> 
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
> 
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
> 
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
> 
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
> 
> Chuck Rasbold
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)


From daniel.daugherty at oracle.com  Fri Nov 16 19:02:50 2018
From: daniel.daugherty at oracle.com (Daniel D. Daugherty)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:02:50 -0500
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6b8fbd6b-a9d2-fb35-3045-4265cadab400@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Dan


On 11/15/18 2:37 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
>
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
>
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
>
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
>
> Chuck Rasbold
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
>


From thomas.schatzl at oracle.com  Fri Nov 16 19:41:02 2018
From: thomas.schatzl at oracle.com (Thomas Schatzl)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 20:41:02 +0100
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <89EBA583-B4B0-4FC2-BBE2-661F4BACB49F@oracle.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <89EBA583-B4B0-4FC2-BBE2-661F4BACB49F@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <edc4a47910b3acc0afe5bd83267250fa53e76322.camel@oracle.com>

Vote: yes



From david.holmes at oracle.com  Sat Nov 17 12:29:45 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:29:45 +1000
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce178a9c-8510-e2d2-c02b-978425847789@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

David

On 16/11/2018 5:37 am, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
> 
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
> 
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
> 
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
> 
> Chuck Rasbold
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
> 

From hohensee at amazon.com  Sun Nov 18 09:27:57 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 09:27:57 +0000
Subject: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EF3A6EFF-2E09-483B-8620-271056C9BF23@amazon.com>

Vote:yes

?On 11/15/18, 8:38 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Chuck Rasbold" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of rasbold at google.com> wrote:

    I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
    Committer.
    
    Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
    "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
    JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
    changes.
    His list of contributions can be found here [3].
    
    Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
    
    Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
    on this nomination.
    Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
    
    For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
    
    Chuck Rasbold
    
    [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
    [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
    [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
    =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
    and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)
    


From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Mon Nov 19 07:53:27 2018
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:53:27 +0100
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh11eK1juPYWvrMQS5cXk1icpDsJvHDYWu2OoV3rBTLfKFw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:38 PM Chuck Rasbold <rasbold at google.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
>
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
>
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
>
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
>
> Chuck Rasbold
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)

From roger.riggs at oracle.com  Mon Nov 19 13:54:11 2018
From: roger.riggs at oracle.com (Roger Riggs)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:54:11 -0500
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c4f79714-8e91-d363-9e29-1cffffaf9114@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

On 11/15/18 2:37 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.


From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Tue Nov 20 17:06:44 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:06:44 +0100
Subject: RFA: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization and
 8212110: Build of saproc.dll broken on Windows 32 bit after JDK-8210647
Message-ID: <804c1b3c1f4741280d715b08263749012f71b01e.camel@redhat.com>

Hi,

Please approve the following backports adding optimization switches for
libsaproc. We have been using this patch in a while now in Fedora
without issues.


8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210647
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8210647/jdk8/webrev.02/
Review-thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-November/023918.html

Since the build system in JDK 8 is different from JDK 12 it needed
another review on build-dev. The 8u change has been reviewed by Erik
Joelsson and JC Beyler.


8212110: Build of saproc.dll broken on Windows 32 bit after JDK-8210647

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212110
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8212110/jdk8/webrev.03/
Review-thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-November/023933.html

Again, build system in JDK 8 is different from JDK 12. It has been
reviewed by Erik Joelsson and Alex Kashchenko on build-dev.

Testing: Builds on Linux x86_64 and Windows. Manual testing of SA
functionality.


In order to not accidentally break any build it would be appreciated if
somebody could run this through JPRT.

Thanks,
Severin


From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Tue Nov 20 17:29:01 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:29:01 +0100
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038: Create
 new launcher for SA tools
Message-ID: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>

Hi,

Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
too.

The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
CLHSDB and HSDB classes.

Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.

webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Severin


From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Wed Nov 21 10:40:16 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:40:16 +0100
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>

Hi Sean,

On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 13:35 +0100, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> Thanks to all for the JDK 8u202 contributions to date. We'll enter RDP2 
> on morning of 29th October (GMT). All changes in the jdk8u-dev forest 
> will then be synced to the jdk8u master forest.
> 
> Once we pass the RDP2 milestone, jdk8u-dev will collect fixes for the 
> next OpenJDK 8u release which will be led by others. I propose that an 
> `openjdk8u` fix version be attributed to such fixes in JBS. A similar 
> value was used for the OpenJDK 7u Project when maintainer duties were 
> handed over to Red Hat. Only critical fixes will be accepted into 8u202 
> post RDP2. The process for such requests is described on the Project 
> page[1].

Any details as to when the RDP milestone will be done and fixes can be
collected for a post-u202 release? Do I need to label pending fixes
with 'openjdk8u' in JBS? If I do so, what needs to happen next for
fixes to get in?

My concern is that fixes will be lost in traffic in the time between
now and January 2019.

Thanks,
Severin

> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html
> 


From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Wed Nov 21 16:05:49 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:05:49 +0000
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
 <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 10:41, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 13:35 +0100, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> > Thanks to all for the JDK 8u202 contributions to date. We'll enter RDP2
> > on morning of 29th October (GMT). All changes in the jdk8u-dev forest
> > will then be synced to the jdk8u master forest.
> >
> > Once we pass the RDP2 milestone, jdk8u-dev will collect fixes for the
> > next OpenJDK 8u release which will be led by others. I propose that an
> > `openjdk8u` fix version be attributed to such fixes in JBS. A similar
> > value was used for the OpenJDK 7u Project when maintainer duties were
> > handed over to Red Hat. Only critical fixes will be accepted into 8u202
> > post RDP2. The process for such requests is described on the Project
> > page[1].
>
> Any details as to when the RDP milestone will be done and fixes can be
> collected for a post-u202 release? Do I need to label pending fixes
> with 'openjdk8u' in JBS? If I do so, what needs to happen next for
> fixes to get in?
>
> My concern is that fixes will be lost in traffic in the time between
> now and January 2019.
>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>
> > regards,
> > Sean.
> >
> > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html
> >
>

That's already happening if you look at:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029661

The 8u backport went into 'openjdk8u'.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Wed Nov 21 16:38:54 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:38:54 +0100
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
 <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
 <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1ab895df7bac7db8ef91438076a59bdd0fe2ac04.camel@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 16:05 +0000, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 10:41, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Sean,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 13:35 +0100, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> > > Thanks to all for the JDK 8u202 contributions to date. We'll enter RDP2
> > > on morning of 29th October (GMT). All changes in the jdk8u-dev forest
> > > will then be synced to the jdk8u master forest.
> > > 
> > > Once we pass the RDP2 milestone, jdk8u-dev will collect fixes for the
> > > next OpenJDK 8u release which will be led by others. I propose that an
> > > `openjdk8u` fix version be attributed to such fixes in JBS. A similar
> > > value was used for the OpenJDK 7u Project when maintainer duties were
> > > handed over to Red Hat. Only critical fixes will be accepted into 8u202
> > > post RDP2. The process for such requests is described on the Project
> > > page[1].
> > 
> > Any details as to when the RDP milestone will be done and fixes can be
> > collected for a post-u202 release? Do I need to label pending fixes
> > with 'openjdk8u' in JBS? If I do so, what needs to happen next for
> > fixes to get in?
> > 
> > My concern is that fixes will be lost in traffic in the time between
> > now and January 2019.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> > 
> > > regards,
> > > Sean.
> > > 
> > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html
> > > 
> 
> That's already happening if you look at:
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029661
> 
> The 8u backport went into 'openjdk8u'.

Heh, I've pushed that patch for Martin :)

Perhaps it's because it's been the only one which happens to have been
pushed after u202 has been forked Oracle internally? After that I
haven't seen many approvals for jdk8u, perhaps because current
maintainers are reluctant to approve something they won't maintain any
more when the release happens? It's a bit of a mystery to me.

Thanks,
Severin


From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Wed Nov 21 17:44:06 2018
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:44:06 +0000
Subject: [8u communication] Call for new maintainers
Message-ID: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>

To help transition this Project to a new Lead, I'd like to invite new 
non Oracle participants to help in maintainer duties. The primary duty 
involved from here on is reviewing and making approval decisions on 
incoming requests which will ultimately end up in the next, non Oracle 
led, release of this Project (post release of JDK 8u202).

Any candidates putting themselves forward for this role should 
demonstrate an active history with the Project and should ideally give 
some background history on their involvement in the Project to date.

If new maintainers are added, an announcement will be made via the 
Project mailing list.

regards,
Sean.


From dalibor.topic at oracle.com  Thu Nov 22 10:09:26 2018
From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:09:26 +0100
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <1ab895df7bac7db8ef91438076a59bdd0fe2ac04.camel@redhat.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
 <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
 <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ab895df7bac7db8ef91438076a59bdd0fe2ac04.camel@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <067b3c9f-f40e-823d-04d3-a4c9e05fac35@oracle.com>

On 21.11.2018 17:38, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Perhaps it's because it's been the only one which happens to have been
> pushed after u202 has been forked Oracle internally? After that I
> haven't seen many approvals for jdk8u, perhaps because current
> maintainers are reluctant to approve something they won't maintain any
> more when the release happens? It's a bit of a mystery to me.

Story time.

A couple of years ago when I was the Project Lead for JDK 7 Updates 
preparing the Project to be transitioned to a new Project Lead, I was 
faced with an interesting logistical problem.

On one hand, the transition to a new Lead and new maintainers taking 
care of approving changes would take place after the last release under 
my responsibility, but on the other hand, technically, while that last 
release was in rampdown, the development forest was still open for the 
next release for everyone to push their changes in ( pending maintainer 
approval) - a release that neither I nor the maintainer team would 
actually be responsible for.

Consequently, two problems would arise, if we had continued to approve 
fixes before the actual transition took place:

a) I'd have to hand over the Project in a 'messy' state, with the next 
release already well in progress with potentially dozens of changes the 
next Project Lead had no say in and would have to take in or back out 
again. Each such change carries a maintenance cost and a maintenance risk.

That's not just a theoretical concern - a few weeks ago on this list a 
backport of AppCDS was proposed. That's precisely the kind of far 
reaching change that I believe must be discussed, understood and 
approved by the Lead and maintainers that would carry its maintenance 
cost and risks, rather than by the outgoing ones.

That is why my suggestion was to restart that discussion after the 
transition in this Project.

b) I'd be asking my fellow Maintainers to work on approving changes that 
they were not actually responsible for delivering, effectively asking 
them to set aside other things they were actually responsible for 
delivering, and risking that they'd find themselves in the middle of 
threads questioning their approval decisions down the road by the next 
set of maintainers actually responsible for delivering on them. [0]

In short, for my fellow Maintainers continuing to be responsible to 
approve changes to JDK 7 Updates that they weren't responsible for 
actually maintaining had all kinds of potential downsides, but no upside.

So, as the JDK 7 Updates Project Lead I chose the simplest path forward, 
carrying the least risk of messing up the transition: I would leave all 
changes that would be proposed after rampdown to the wisdom of the next 
set of maintainers. In short, we had a clean cut from one set of 
maintainers to the next.

That worked, of course, but it wasn't always great for everyone either, 
as I believe some people had to sit on their changes until the 
transition took place.

With the upcoming transition in this Project, Sean, i.e. the Project 
Lead, has chosen [1] a different and I think better path - to widen the 
set of Maintainers ahead of the transition, making the approval process 
a bit smoother in consequence, so that potential future maintainers 
would be able to approve changes for their next release before the 
actual transition of Project Leads.

TLDR: I assume that approvals will pick up again once the new 
maintainers are on board.

cheers,
dalibor topic

[0] I'll leave a story involving two letters here for future 
maintainers: 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1982/01/15/a-tale-of-two-letters/e1f65aa4-66ce-4991-8a1b-840fc6956766/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.26ad7b2224af 
;)

[1] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008179.html
-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603

Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

From aph at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 10:21:32 2018
From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:21:32 +0000
Subject: [8u communication] Call for new maintainers
In-Reply-To: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
References: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <97b5f9dd-4179-8c8b-a7d8-f72bc8841492@redhat.com>

On 11/21/18 5:44 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> To help transition this Project to a new Lead, I'd like to invite new 
> non Oracle participants to help in maintainer duties. The primary duty 
> involved from here on is reviewing and making approval decisions on 
> incoming requests which will ultimately end up in the next, non Oracle 
> led, release of this Project (post release of JDK 8u202).

That sounds sensible.

> Any candidates putting themselves forward for this role should 
> demonstrate an active history with the Project and should ideally give 
> some background history on their involvement in the Project to date.
> 
> If new maintainers are added, an announcement will be made via the 
> Project mailing list.

I've not been very active in jdk8u, but I lead the 7u project.
I am a jdk8u committer but not a reviewer. I will apply to be a
reviewer.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 10:24:02 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:24:02 +0100
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <067b3c9f-f40e-823d-04d3-a4c9e05fac35@oracle.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
 <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
 <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ab895df7bac7db8ef91438076a59bdd0fe2ac04.camel@redhat.com>
 <067b3c9f-f40e-823d-04d3-a4c9e05fac35@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <51316cc275d0ccdcd86a8801bd8018ec9700875a.camel@redhat.com>

Hi Dalibor,

On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 11:09 +0100, dalibor topic wrote:
> With the upcoming transition in this Project, Sean, i.e. the Project 
> Lead, has chosen [1] a different and I think better path - to widen the 
> set of Maintainers ahead of the transition, making the approval process 
> a bit smoother in consequence, so that potential future maintainers 
> would be able to approve changes for their next release before the 
> actual transition of Project Leads.

Agreed. This is most welcome and makes the most sense IMHO.

> TLDR: I assume that approvals will pick up again once the new 
> maintainers are on board.

Fingers crossed ;-)

Thanks for being proactive about those issues and giving the community
a foot in the door early! It's much appreciated.

Thanks,
Severin


From goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com  Thu Nov 22 16:37:10 2018
From: goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com (Lindenmaier, Goetz)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:37:10 +0000
Subject: RFR(S): downport 8211326: add OS user related information to hs_err
 file
Message-ID: <a940ffd034a74fdc9c5e61577b66acb7@sap.com>

Hi,

I would like to downport 8211326. It helps us maintain systems
that are (and most will be) running on jdk11.

Unfortunately, in posix.hpp the context changed slightly, and thus
the change does not apply. So I need a review.
Webrev against jdk11u:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8211326-hs_err-user-jdk11u/01/
Original webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8211326.4/

Best regards,
  Goetz.

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 18:48:51 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:48:51 +0000
Subject: [8u communication] Call for new maintainers
In-Reply-To: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
References: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P7UdT20dfh98YvGEojxqupxT1yOJPDPoaV+yJ_rV1Knxw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 17:44, Se?n Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> To help transition this Project to a new Lead, I'd like to invite new
> non Oracle participants to help in maintainer duties. The primary duty
> involved from here on is reviewing and making approval decisions on
> incoming requests which will ultimately end up in the next, non Oracle
> led, release of this Project (post release of JDK 8u202).
>

I've been thinking a lot about the future of 8u recently, so this announcement
is timely.

> Any candidates putting themselves forward for this role should
> demonstrate an active history with the Project and should ideally give
> some background history on their involvement in the Project to date.
>

I'd like to put myself forward for such a role. I've been involved in
the OpenJDK
project since its inception, and handled the backports & releases for OpenJDK 6
and 7 while under Andrew Haley's leadership. I'm a reviewer on all JDK projects
from 6 up.

> If new maintainers are added, an announcement will be made via the
> Project mailing list.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 19:00:53 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:00:53 +0000
Subject: [8u-communication] JDK 8u202 RDP2
In-Reply-To: <067b3c9f-f40e-823d-04d3-a4c9e05fac35@oracle.com>
References: <ad70e6eb-c662-8918-1afa-136a633cd8f4@oracle.com>
 <a59176c1371d065d23b8a26fd05d8ab5fe0eeb22.camel@redhat.com>
 <CABi63P5cWKopWH3aR7DKRCG59dODKDhki4KvGAyr5xZ-kNpwsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ab895df7bac7db8ef91438076a59bdd0fe2ac04.camel@redhat.com>
 <067b3c9f-f40e-823d-04d3-a4c9e05fac35@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P7QdM2AmtOr7rJxiWLk5APsUCb9n4qwKOAV0PcP3y2p-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 10:10, dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at oracle.com> wrote:

snip...

> That worked, of course, but it wasn't always great for everyone either,
> as I believe some people had to sit on their changes until the
> transition took place.

Yes... and I was beginning to worry we were falling into the same thing again.
It's good to hear you're aware of it too.

>
> With the upcoming transition in this Project, Sean, i.e. the Project
> Lead, has chosen [1] a different and I think better path - to widen the
> set of Maintainers ahead of the transition, making the approval process
> a bit smoother in consequence, so that potential future maintainers
> would be able to approve changes for their next release before the
> actual transition of Project Leads.
>
> TLDR: I assume that approvals will pick up again once the new
> maintainers are on board.

I completely understand the dilemma. It's funny that I was wondering only
yesterday whether there was an application process for maintainers, so
we could get others on board to ease the transition, before the actual
leadership switch... :-)

>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
> [0] I'll leave a story involving two letters here for future
> maintainers:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1982/01/15/a-tale-of-two-letters/e1f65aa4-66ce-4991-8a1b-840fc6956766/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.26ad7b2224af
> ;)
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008179.html
> --
> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
> <tel:+491737185961>
>
> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>
> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603
>
> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
> practices and products that help protect the environment



-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 19:18:41 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:18:41 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
Message-ID: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>

I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.

Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.

Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
to the older releases.

Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.

Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
list.

For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].

[0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
[1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
[4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
[5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 19:19:50 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:19:50 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P4py3UcH60krAgvOY2MsaPm-u-b3XQOpZmONA0j5utR7A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 19:18, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Vote: Yes.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From shade at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 19:25:34 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:25:34 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7f5db602-72cf-82c9-a7ff-bf3ac07604a9@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/22/18 8:18 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.


From omajid at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 19:38:47 2018
From: omajid at redhat.com (Omair Majid)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:38:47 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20181122193847.GD4204@redhat.com>

Vote: Yes

* Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> [2018-11-22 14:20]:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.

Cheers,
Omair

-- 
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0

From shade at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 20:09:11 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:09:11 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <7f5db602-72cf-82c9-a7ff-bf3ac07604a9@redhat.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7f5db602-72cf-82c9-a7ff-bf3ac07604a9@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <f25039ae-4130-66e7-f05e-f7aab3c05157@redhat.com>

Ah, I am not 8u Reviewer, so not eligible to vote. Sorry for confusion.

-Aleksey

On 11/22/18 8:25 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Vote: yes
> 
> On 11/22/18 8:18 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>>
>> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
>> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
>> list.



From martinrb at google.com  Thu Nov 22 20:33:48 2018
From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:33:48 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+kOe08SvOzYar_wmnuvJR1a=8zOA1dgagsVqB8inYRO+3AQSw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?
> revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%
> 22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=
> 200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-
> November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>

From zgu at redhat.com  Thu Nov 22 21:28:21 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:28:21 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4315f046-7bf5-d3cd-4fd8-5ea6c592d503@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

-Zhengyu

On 11/22/18 2:18 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From david.holmes at oracle.com  Thu Nov 22 21:37:02 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:37:02 +1000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7aa4a099-0450-b4ba-7a4c-4b3f1f09c469@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

David

On 23/11/2018 5:18 am, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Thu Nov 22 21:53:28 2018
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:53:28 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7aa74b5e-891c-9865-537f-7cd7c82852c9@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

regards,
Sean.


On 22/11/2018 19:18, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus


From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Thu Nov 22 21:54:41 2018
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:54:41 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e00e14a3-977d-a1f3-9b3b-95c9cf4041fd@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

regards,
Sean.


On 13/11/2018 05:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>
> While Andrew has only a couple of backports to OpenJDK 8u so far [0]
> [1], he is already a committer for OpenJDK 7 Updates & a reviewer for
> OpenJDK 9 and up. Thus, his lack of committer status on OpenJDK 8
> Updates seems more a simple case of when he started contributing to
> OpenJDK - as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.
>
> Votes are due by 17h00 UTC on the 27th of November, 2018.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8 Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on
> this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
>
> [0] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(adinn)+or+desc(%22adinn%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote


From david.holmes at oracle.com  Thu Nov 22 22:06:26 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:06:26 +1000
Subject: RFR(S): downport 8211326: add OS user related information to
 hs_err file
In-Reply-To: <a940ffd034a74fdc9c5e61577b66acb7@sap.com>
References: <a940ffd034a74fdc9c5e61577b66acb7@sap.com>
Message-ID: <82f78262-17b8-ae00-d6d9-767f1362054a@oracle.com>

Hi Goetz,

Not sure why jdk8u-dev is cc'd here??

This depends on the backport of JDK-8211845, but Thomas has withdrawn 
that backport request. That process needs to be reinstated.

Otherwise the actual backport looks accurate.

Thanks,
David

On 23/11/2018 2:37 am, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to downport 8211326. It helps us maintain systems
> that are (and most will be) running on jdk11.
> 
> Unfortunately, in posix.hpp the context changed slightly, and thus
> the change does not apply. So I need a review.
> Webrev against jdk11u:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8211326-hs_err-user-jdk11u/01/
> Original webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8211326.4/
> 
> Best regards,
>    Goetz.
> 

From rasbold at google.com  Fri Nov 23 03:15:34 2018
From: rasbold at google.com (Chuck Rasbold)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:15:34 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALFb4KvEKfL131dy9_XV566iPQA9XzRadxXFnPj05_gz5eVUuQ@mail.gmail.com>

VoteL yes

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?
> revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%
> 22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=
> 200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-
> November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>

From rwestrel at redhat.com  Fri Nov 23 08:11:37 2018
From: rwestrel at redhat.com (Roland Westrelin)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:11:37 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87lg5knrgm.fsf@redhat.com>


Vote: yes.

Roland.

From daniel.fuchs at oracle.com  Fri Nov 23 09:54:31 2018
From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com (Daniel Fuchs)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:54:31 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c0cb068f-6f9b-8af2-95a6-143e869620c5@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

best regards,

-- daniel

On 22/11/2018 19:18, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 


From zgu at redhat.com  Fri Nov 23 12:45:36 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:45:36 -0500
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout the
 diagnostic option
Message-ID: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>

Hi,

I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync 
time.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
Original review: 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html

Backport has only minor conflicts.
Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/


Thanks,

-Zhengyu

From shade at redhat.com  Fri Nov 23 13:19:25 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:19:25 +0100
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>

Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?

-Aleksey

On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
> 
> Backport has only minor conflicts.
> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Zhengyu



From zgu at redhat.com  Fri Nov 23 13:42:07 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:42:07 -0500
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <48b383f8-c180-6fe4-2b24-e1fc1c23399b@redhat.com>

On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?

Yes, I think so. But has to be another RFR to jdk-updates-dev, right?

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

> 
> -Aleksey
> 
> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>>
>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
> 
> 

From shade at redhat.com  Fri Nov 23 13:47:24 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:47:24 +0100
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <48b383f8-c180-6fe4-2b24-e1fc1c23399b@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <48b383f8-c180-6fe4-2b24-e1fc1c23399b@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <a3caf335-6035-73a6-0c85-9310a6de6344@redhat.com>

On 11/23/18 2:42 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
> 
> Yes, I think so. But has to be another RFR to jdk-updates-dev, right?

No, put a jdk11u-fix-request on the bug, and wait for approval there, see:
 https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/approval.html

(I wish 8u updates moved to the same process, it seems to scale much better)

-Aleksey


From daniel.daugherty at oracle.com  Sat Nov 24 15:21:52 2018
From: daniel.daugherty at oracle.com (Daniel D. Daugherty)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:21:52 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f2ee8dda-a760-18ab-e95c-99181bc36788@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Dan


On 11/22/18 2:18 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus


From zgu at redhat.com  Sun Nov 25 18:02:10 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 13:02:10 -0500
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>

Hi Aleksey,

Can I take this as reviewed?

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
> 
> -Aleksey
> 
> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>>
>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
> 
> 

From shade at redhat.com  Sun Nov 25 18:29:08 2018
From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:29:08 +0100
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>

Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.

Thanks,
-Aleksey

On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
> 
> Can I take this as reviewed?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Zhengyu
> 
> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
>>
>> -Aleksey
>>
>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>>>
>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>
>>



From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Sun Nov 25 23:28:38 2018
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:28:38 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71094ae0-ea6a-ebd5-3bcd-eb7b0d4aec38@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/22/18 11:18 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
> and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
> He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
> having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
> and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
> AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com  Mon Nov 26 12:57:22 2018
From: goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com (Lindenmaier, Goetz)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:57:22 +0000
Subject: RFR(S): downport 8211326: add OS user related information to
 hs_err file
In-Reply-To: <82f78262-17b8-ae00-d6d9-767f1362054a@oracle.com>
References: <a940ffd034a74fdc9c5e61577b66acb7@sap.com>
 <82f78262-17b8-ae00-d6d9-767f1362054a@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <685dd2229c0d41029cca834ac8ea938a@sap.com>

Hi David, 

thanks for reviewing.

I know about the dependency on Thomas' change.
He'll take charge.
8u-dev was meant to be jdk-updates-dev.

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. November 2018 23:06
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; hotspot-dev Source
> Developers <hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR(S): downport 8211326: add OS user related information to
> hs_err file
> 
> Hi Goetz,
> 
> Not sure why jdk8u-dev is cc'd here??
> 
> This depends on the backport of JDK-8211845, but Thomas has withdrawn
> that backport request. That process needs to be reinstated.
> 
> Otherwise the actual backport looks accurate.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> On 23/11/2018 2:37 am, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to downport 8211326. It helps us maintain systems
> > that are (and most will be) running on jdk11.
> >
> > Unfortunately, in posix.hpp the context changed slightly, and thus
> > the change does not apply. So I need a review.
> > Webrev against jdk11u:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8211326-hs_err-user-jdk11u/01/
> > Original webrev:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8211326.4/
> >
> > Best regards,
> >    Goetz.
> >

From hohensee at amazon.com  Mon Nov 26 17:21:13 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:21:13 +0000
Subject: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <653B9D8E-7E0F-492E-BCD4-7ACA6B042D3C@amazon.com>

Vote:yes

?On 11/22/18, 11:20 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Hughes" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

    I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
    
    Andrew has been active within the OpenJDK project since its inception,
    and has led both the OpenJDK 6 & 7 projects after Oracle stood down.
    He is a current 'at large' member of the OpenJDK governing board,
    having been successfully voted into that position on a number of occasions,
    and is the lead & founder of the AArch64 project.
    
    Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later, thanks to the
    AArch64 project, but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
    In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
    status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
    seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
    as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
    not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
    technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
    covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
    to the older releases.
    
    Votes are due by the 6th of December, 2018, at 16h00 UTC.
    
    Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
    nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
    list.
    
    For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
    
    [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#aph
    [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(aph)+or+desc(%22aph%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
    [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
    [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
    -- 
    Andrew :)
    
    Senior Free Java Software Engineer
    Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
    
    Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
    PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
    Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
    


From zgu at redhat.com  Mon Nov 26 17:38:20 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:38:20 -0500
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
 <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>

Thanks, Aleksey!

-Zhengyu

On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey
> 
> On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> Can I take this as reviewed?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>>
>> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
>>>
>>> -Aleksey
>>>
>>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>>>>
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>>>>
>>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>>
> 
> 

From hohensee at amazon.com  Mon Nov 26 18:09:22 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:09:22 +0000
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
 <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
 <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>

Lgtm too, and +1 on backporting to 11u as well. I'm a bit surprised that the original RFE doesn't have a CSR, since it changed an interface. But, since there was no CSR for the original RFE, imo there's no need for one for backports.

Paul

?On 11/26/18, 9:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Zhengyu Gu" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of zgu at redhat.com> wrote:

    Thanks, Aleksey!
    
    -Zhengyu
    
    On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
    > Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > -Aleksey
    > 
    > On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
    >> Hi Aleksey,
    >>
    >> Can I take this as reviewed?
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> -Zhengyu
    >>
    >> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
    >>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
    >>>
    >>> -Aleksey
    >>>
    >>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
    >>>> Hi,
    >>>>
    >>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
    >>>>
    >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
    >>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
    >>>>
    >>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
    >>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>>
    >>>> -Zhengyu
    >>>
    >>>
    > 
    > 
    


From zgu at redhat.com  Mon Nov 26 18:12:01 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:12:01 -0500
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
 <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
 <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>
 <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <eb5c2b13-501d-04fa-ae4f-c3f89e452d30@redhat.com>

Thanks, Paul!

I requested 11u backport, waiting for approval.

-Zhengyu

On 11/26/18 1:09 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> Lgtm too, and +1 on backporting to 11u as well. I'm a bit surprised that the original RFE doesn't have a CSR, since it changed an interface. But, since there was no CSR for the original RFE, imo there's no need for one for backports.
> 
> Paul
> 
> ?On 11/26/18, 9:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Zhengyu Gu" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>      Thanks, Aleksey!
>      
>      -Zhengyu
>      
>      On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      > Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > -Aleksey
>      >
>      > On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >> Hi Aleksey,
>      >>
>      >> Can I take this as reviewed?
>      >>
>      >> Thanks,
>      >>
>      >> -Zhengyu
>      >>
>      >> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      >>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
>      >>>
>      >>> -Aleksey
>      >>>
>      >>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >>>> Hi,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>      >>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>      >>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Thanks,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> -Zhengyu
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >
>      >
>      
> 

From zgu at redhat.com  Mon Nov 26 18:17:42 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:17:42 -0500
Subject: RFA: [8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout the
 diagnostic option
Message-ID: <caf33216-b86c-9ff6-d6d8-ce07189bcaa1@redhat.com>

Hi,

Please approve the backport of JDK-8213992 to 8u, it helps to diagnose 
long safepoint sync time.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
JDK12 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/639a3e43f5b7
JDK12 review thread: 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html

JDK8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
JDK8u review thread: 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008200.html

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

From david.holmes at oracle.com  Mon Nov 26 23:14:24 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:14:24 +1000
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
 <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
 <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>
 <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <a26bb278-bd3f-9b4b-26d7-d6c25ade8c85@oracle.com>

On 27/11/2018 4:09 am, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> Lgtm too, and +1 on backporting to 11u as well. I'm a bit surprised that the original RFE doesn't have a CSR, since it changed an interface. But, since there was no CSR for the original RFE, imo there's no need for one for backports.

"Interfaces that are experimental or for diagnostic purposes do not need 
to go through CSR process, but the CSR process may be employed if 
feedback from the CSR reviewers is desired." [1]

And it was originally a develop flag which is also outside the CSR 
process (though not mentioned in the CSR FAQ).

Cheers,
David

[1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr/CSR+FAQs



> Paul
> 
> ?On 11/26/18, 9:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Zhengyu Gu" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>      Thanks, Aleksey!
>      
>      -Zhengyu
>      
>      On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      > Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > -Aleksey
>      >
>      > On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >> Hi Aleksey,
>      >>
>      >> Can I take this as reviewed?
>      >>
>      >> Thanks,
>      >>
>      >> -Zhengyu
>      >>
>      >> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      >>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
>      >>>
>      >>> -Aleksey
>      >>>
>      >>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >>>> Hi,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>      >>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>      >>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Thanks,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> -Zhengyu
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >
>      >
>      
> 

From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 11:36:08 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:36:08 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Andrew Haley
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P71fEmzPBZD5UsRoC3dLWVq8c-4RCBUurAN+bykcMgoMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b14fbfdd-b6b3-e71c-7b33-4e2e828072b2@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


On 22/11/2018 19:18, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Haley [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>


From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 11:36:36 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:36:36 +0000
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7440bf78-f824-2711-436d-46faa3ed9b6a@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


On 15/11/2018 19:37, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
>


From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 11:37:17 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:37:17 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <36c4fffe-8b8a-b354-fae4-30d6a504405a@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


On 13/11/2018 05:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
>


From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 12:18:53 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:18:53 +0000
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038:
 Create new launcher for SA tools
In-Reply-To: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
References: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>

Hi Severin,

I would be in favour of things that make the SA tools more visible. 8-)

Did you mean to create a clhsdb launcher as well as the jhsdb one I can 
see here?

The alternative would be backporting the jhsdb command itself, but we 
don't want to take _out_ any existing launchers, and having both would 
be odd, so I'd vote for what you're proposing here.

Thanks
Kevin


On 20/11/2018 17:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
> for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
> JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
> serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
> too.
>
> The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
> them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
> launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
> CLHSDB and HSDB classes.
>
> Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>


From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 12:32:43 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:32:43 +0100
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038:
 Create new launcher for SA tools
In-Reply-To: <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>
References: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
 <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <0b0ddbcd809579f6d3a1900e1649ef1a2702b248.camel@redhat.com>

Hi Kevin,

On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 12:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Hi Severin,
> 
> I would be in favour of things that make the SA tools more visible. 8-)
> 
> Did you mean to create a clhsdb launcher as well as the jhsdb one I can 
> see here?

Not sure what you mean by this.

In JDK 9+ clhsdb is being launched with jhsdb, is it not? In particular
this: "bin/jhsdb clhsdb". The gui would be "bin/jhsdb hsdb". After this
patch JDK 8 will have jhsdb which will be able to launch 'hsdb' or
'clhsdb' in the same way as JDK 9+ does (modulo different switches like
--pid, etc.)

> The alternative would be backporting the jhsdb command itself, but we 
> don't want to take _out_ any existing launchers, and having both would 
> be odd, so I'd vote for what you're proposing here.

Maybe I'm wrong, but the proposed patch adds the jhsdb command into bin
for JDK 8. Thanks for your input!

Cheers,
Severin

> Thanks
> Kevin
> 
> 
> On 20/11/2018 17:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
> > for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
> > JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
> > serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
> > too.
> > 
> > The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
> > them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
> > launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
> > CLHSDB and HSDB classes.
> > 
> > Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.
> > 
> > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> > 
> 
> 


From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 13:18:48 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:18:48 +0000
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038:
 Create new launcher for SA tools
In-Reply-To: <0b0ddbcd809579f6d3a1900e1649ef1a2702b248.camel@redhat.com>
References: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
 <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>
 <0b0ddbcd809579f6d3a1900e1649ef1a2702b248.camel@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56f9233e-76e3-50f9-27bc-06ce66f68902@oracle.com>

Hi,

OK maybe I misread your intent.? I though? "adds launchers for CLHSDB 
and HSDB" meant standalone launchers like jstack and friends, because 
that's how we do this (how we have done done this) in jdk8.

JDK-8059038 exists because of removal of -F ("SA options") from jstack 
etc., so it's not so relevant in 8?

I didn't imagine you'd propose the new jhsdb command in jdk8u, but I see 
in the hotspot repo change you are bringing back SALauncher.java.? 
You're proposing a stripped-down version of SALauncher.java for those 
two commands, but it won't launch jstack, jmap, jinfo, ... as it would 
in later versions.

That might be confusing, I would have thought a standalone launcher for 
clhsdb and hsdb made sense?

Thanks
Kevin


On 28/11/2018 12:32, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 12:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Hi Severin,
>>
>> I would be in favour of things that make the SA tools more visible. 8-)
>>
>> Did you mean to create a clhsdb launcher as well as the jhsdb one I can
>> see here?
> Not sure what you mean by this.
>
> In JDK 9+ clhsdb is being launched with jhsdb, is it not? In particular
> this: "bin/jhsdb clhsdb". The gui would be "bin/jhsdb hsdb". After this
> patch JDK 8 will have jhsdb which will be able to launch 'hsdb' or
> 'clhsdb' in the same way as JDK 9+ does (modulo different switches like
> --pid, etc.)
>
>> The alternative would be backporting the jhsdb command itself, but we
>> don't want to take _out_ any existing launchers, and having both would
>> be odd, so I'd vote for what you're proposing here.
> Maybe I'm wrong, but the proposed patch adds the jhsdb command into bin
> for JDK 8. Thanks for your input!
>
> Cheers,
> Severin
>
>> Thanks
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On 20/11/2018 17:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
>>> for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
>>> JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
>>> serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
>>> too.
>>>
>>> The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
>>> them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
>>> launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
>>> CLHSDB and HSDB classes.
>>>
>>> Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.
>>>
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Severin
>>>
>>


From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 13:47:18 2018
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:47:18 +0100
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038:
 Create new launcher for SA tools
In-Reply-To: <56f9233e-76e3-50f9-27bc-06ce66f68902@oracle.com>
References: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
 <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>
 <0b0ddbcd809579f6d3a1900e1649ef1a2702b248.camel@redhat.com>
 <56f9233e-76e3-50f9-27bc-06ce66f68902@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <6c80a7b09d69e0fa7caf307a8e315ed5656a9b52.camel@redhat.com>

Hi Kevin,

On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 13:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> OK maybe I misread your intent.  I though  "adds launchers for CLHSDB 
> and HSDB" meant standalone launchers like jstack and friends, because 
> that's how we do this (how we have done done this) in jdk8.
> 
> JDK-8059038 exists because of removal of -F ("SA options") from jstack 
> etc., so it's not so relevant in 8?

The intent is to have *some* way to launch the SA (CLI or GUI). Whether
it's going to be via direct launchers (e.g. clhsdb and hsdb) or via
'jhsdb <foo>' seems debatable. Either way works for me.

> I didn't imagine you'd propose the new jhsdb command in jdk8u, but I see 
> in the hotspot repo change you are bringing back SALauncher.java.  
> You're proposing a stripped-down version of SALauncher.java for those 
> two commands, but it won't launch jstack, jmap, jinfo, ... as it would 
> in later versions.
> 
> That might be confusing

Thinking about it that way it might be confusing. On the other hand, it
could be confusing to have them available via launchers directly in JDK
8, but JDK 9+ would use jhsdb <foo> instead. Yet again, the same is
true for jstack and friends, so...

> I would have thought a standalone launcher for 
> clhsdb and hsdb made sense?

If that's the preferred way to get an SA launcher done for JDK 8,
that's fine with me. I can revise the patch if you think that it would
then make it more likely to get approved.

Thanks,
Severin

> Thanks
> Kevin
> 
> 
> On 28/11/2018 12:32, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 12:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
> > > Hi Severin,
> > > 
> > > I would be in favour of things that make the SA tools more visible. 8-)
> > > 
> > > Did you mean to create a clhsdb launcher as well as the jhsdb one I can
> > > see here?
> > 
> > Not sure what you mean by this.
> > 
> > In JDK 9+ clhsdb is being launched with jhsdb, is it not? In particular
> > this: "bin/jhsdb clhsdb". The gui would be "bin/jhsdb hsdb". After this
> > patch JDK 8 will have jhsdb which will be able to launch 'hsdb' or
> > 'clhsdb' in the same way as JDK 9+ does (modulo different switches like
> > --pid, etc.)
> > 
> > > The alternative would be backporting the jhsdb command itself, but we
> > > don't want to take _out_ any existing launchers, and having both would
> > > be odd, so I'd vote for what you're proposing here.
> > 
> > Maybe I'm wrong, but the proposed patch adds the jhsdb command into bin
> > for JDK 8. Thanks for your input!
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Severin
> > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Kevin
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 20/11/2018 17:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
> > > > for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
> > > > JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
> > > > serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
> > > > too.
> > > > 
> > > > The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
> > > > them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
> > > > launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
> > > > CLHSDB and HSDB classes.
> > > > 
> > > > Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.
> > > > 
> > > > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
> > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038
> > > > 
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Severin
> > > > 
> 
> 


From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 14:14:57 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:14:57 +0000
Subject: [8u] Request for enhancement backport approval for 8059038:
 Create new launcher for SA tools
In-Reply-To: <6c80a7b09d69e0fa7caf307a8e315ed5656a9b52.camel@redhat.com>
References: <ee7ffe773e24e31c2b3af8130e7f3f64b2cf8445.camel@redhat.com>
 <4252e8fe-e022-2aa6-6c34-40ea7f35dead@oracle.com>
 <0b0ddbcd809579f6d3a1900e1649ef1a2702b248.camel@redhat.com>
 <56f9233e-76e3-50f9-27bc-06ce66f68902@oracle.com>
 <6c80a7b09d69e0fa7caf307a8e315ed5656a9b52.camel@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <7f95d2fe-b5a8-68aa-a488-6a1da9d280da@oracle.com>

Thanks Severin,

Sure I completely support the intent to have launchers for CLHSDB and 
HSDB in there.? Yes I would advise to not create a new but different 
version of the jhsdb command in 8, as it would look like later JDKs and 
not function the same way.? I'm happy that you're happy to do it that way.

Clearly needs a maintainer comment regarding enhancement approval.

Thanks
Kevin


On 28/11/2018 13:47, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 13:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> OK maybe I misread your intent.  I though  "adds launchers for CLHSDB
>> and HSDB" meant standalone launchers like jstack and friends, because
>> that's how we do this (how we have done done this) in jdk8.
>>
>> JDK-8059038 exists because of removal of -F ("SA options") from jstack
>> etc., so it's not so relevant in 8?
> The intent is to have *some* way to launch the SA (CLI or GUI). Whether
> it's going to be via direct launchers (e.g. clhsdb and hsdb) or via
> 'jhsdb <foo>' seems debatable. Either way works for me.
>
>> I didn't imagine you'd propose the new jhsdb command in jdk8u, but I see
>> in the hotspot repo change you are bringing back SALauncher.java.
>> You're proposing a stripped-down version of SALauncher.java for those
>> two commands, but it won't launch jstack, jmap, jinfo, ... as it would
>> in later versions.
>>
>> That might be confusing
> Thinking about it that way it might be confusing. On the other hand, it
> could be confusing to have them available via launchers directly in JDK
> 8, but JDK 9+ would use jhsdb <foo> instead. Yet again, the same is
> true for jstack and friends, so...
>
>> I would have thought a standalone launcher for
>> clhsdb and hsdb made sense?
> If that's the preferred way to get an SA launcher done for JDK 8,
> that's fine with me. I can revise the patch if you think that it would
> then make it more likely to get approved.
>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>
>> Thanks
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On 28/11/2018 12:32, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 12:18 +0000, Kevin Walls wrote:
>>>> Hi Severin,
>>>>
>>>> I would be in favour of things that make the SA tools more visible. 8-)
>>>>
>>>> Did you mean to create a clhsdb launcher as well as the jhsdb one I can
>>>> see here?
>>> Not sure what you mean by this.
>>>
>>> In JDK 9+ clhsdb is being launched with jhsdb, is it not? In particular
>>> this: "bin/jhsdb clhsdb". The gui would be "bin/jhsdb hsdb". After this
>>> patch JDK 8 will have jhsdb which will be able to launch 'hsdb' or
>>> 'clhsdb' in the same way as JDK 9+ does (modulo different switches like
>>> --pid, etc.)
>>>
>>>> The alternative would be backporting the jhsdb command itself, but we
>>>> don't want to take _out_ any existing launchers, and having both would
>>>> be odd, so I'd vote for what you're proposing here.
>>> Maybe I'm wrong, but the proposed patch adds the jhsdb command into bin
>>> for JDK 8. Thanks for your input!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Severin
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2018 17:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please approve this enhancement backport request which adds launchers
>>>>> for CLHSDB and HSDB (part of the sa-jdi.jar) currently not present in
>>>>> JDK 8u. JDK 9+ has 'jshsdb clhsdb' (CLI) and 'jhsdb hsdb' (GUI) for the
>>>>> serviceability agent. This patch would make those available in JDK 8u
>>>>> too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The risk of making them available is none. It's not possible to use
>>>>> them this way right now. The commands don't exist. Except for a new
>>>>> launcher no new code has been added. The launcher delegates to existing
>>>>> CLHSDB and HSDB classes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing: New basic test, manual testing that launchers work.
>>>>>
>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8059038/01/
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059038
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Severin
>>>>>
>>


From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 17:25:34 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:25:34 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
Message-ID: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>

I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.

He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.

Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
to the older releases.

Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.

Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
list.

For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].

[0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
[1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
[3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
[4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
[5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 17:29:34 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:29:34 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P4r_MYxbeyCJ7HgYkdKUbxDSumm_v4EyqTt2ZXA26x5tw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 17:25, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Vote: Yes.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 17:31:34 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:31:34 +0000
Subject: CFV: New JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
In-Reply-To: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALFb4Ku7UE+PYS82otkgJ1EHuPvxmU=_64DZfU4bhyunowXfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P5MxsodhON=wJ8o78ayRuRBifYyHSxQF3Qrb1+kEtFuXA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 19:38, Chuck Rasbold <rasbold at google.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) to JDK 8 Updates
> Committer.
>
> Jean Christophe works on the "Java Performance and Garbage Collection" and
> "Java Runtime" teams at Google. While he presently has no contributions to
> JDK 8 Updates, he is a JDK committer and has contributed more than 70
> changes.
> His list of contributions can be found here [3].
>
> Votes are due by 12:00 pm PST, November 29, 2018.
>
> Only current JDK 8 Updates Committers or Reviewers [1] are eligible to vote
> on this nomination.
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
>
> Chuck Rasbold
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?revcount=1000&rev
> =(keyword(%22jcbeyler%40google.com%22)+or+author(jcbeyler))+
> and+not+desc(%22Merge%22)

Vote: Yes.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 17:32:04 2018
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:32:04 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5087ddd6-2010-aeb4-9b24-aa92d794472b@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 11/28/18 9:25 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From rwestrel at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 17:35:52 2018
From: rwestrel at redhat.com (Roland Westrelin)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:35:52 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87o9a9ksuf.fsf@redhat.com>


Vote: yes

Roland.

From zgu at redhat.com  Wed Nov 28 17:37:51 2018
From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:37:51 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ab512d13-96dd-7817-fbc3-52f1cde4996a@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

-Zhengyu

On 11/28/18 12:25 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From martinrb at google.com  Wed Nov 28 17:50:36 2018
From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:50:36 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+kOe0_t1Wd7OcvaCBGsSxMRwP2wSDKMPgGtApDdqH6zXTTeVw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?
> revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%
> 40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=
> 200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-
> November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>

From david.holmes at oracle.com  Wed Nov 28 20:55:28 2018
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:55:28 +1000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <47a9508d-f9a2-15cc-7e33-ca3390853763@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

David

On 29/11/2018 3:25 am, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
> 
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
> 
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
> 
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
> 
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
> 

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 29 05:01:47 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:01:47 +0000
Subject: Result: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
Message-ID: <CABi63P5k19Sm97PV0-bfvVc7Wnxwbu_6-uArppW3TosXA2CZbg@mail.gmail.com>

Voting for Andrew Dinn [0] is now closed.

Yes: 21
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0

Turnout: 10% (21/215)

According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus [1], this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.

[0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008134.html
[1] https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Thu Nov 29 05:02:50 2018
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:02:50 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer: Andrew Dinn
In-Reply-To: <36c4fffe-8b8a-b354-fae4-30d6a504405a@oracle.com>
References: <CABi63P7dyCDHQPqwAckA1cZFpCYKQUk5sdFMnjgwOEaQr1y8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <36c4fffe-8b8a-b354-fae4-30d6a504405a@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <CABi63P7mLh+sP+OJ2F+HZEjeY1ac+hjxpAOkzQRvNS=KjP+mcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 11:39, Kevin Walls <kevin.walls at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Vote: yes
>
>
> On 13/11/2018 05:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > I hereby nominate Andrew Dinn (adinn) to OpenJDK 8 Updates Committer.
> >
>

I'm afraid this vote was too late for the cut-off time of 2018-11-27 @
17h00 UTC.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

From thomas.schatzl at oracle.com  Thu Nov 29 09:49:36 2018
From: thomas.schatzl at oracle.com (Thomas Schatzl)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:49:36 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ff1e694434f1cc58d80080f874f45db363995ee.camel@oracle.com>

Vote: yes



From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com  Thu Nov 29 16:15:17 2018
From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:15:17 -0800
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d7268e2c-62a2-2215-f5ce-dc6b104a67c0@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

-- 
Best regards, Sergey.

From daniel.daugherty at oracle.com  Thu Nov 29 20:04:37 2018
From: daniel.daugherty at oracle.com (Daniel D. Daugherty)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:04:37 -0500
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d53f7a38-7a27-638a-a8fd-96b39cf6c015@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Dan


On 11/28/18 12:25 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
>
> He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
> a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
>
> Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
> but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
> In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
> status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
> seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
> as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
> not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
> technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
> covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
> to the older releases.
>
> Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
>
> Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
> [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus


From hohensee at amazon.com  Thu Nov 29 23:41:21 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:41:21 +0000
Subject: New OpenJDK 8u Reviewer: Aleksey Shipilev
In-Reply-To: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABi63P4hepsNMKsm9ixqUcEjdQvkKhbE6o6t-Po5ArAcpX-j0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <F3DE926B-6F37-42A7-BBD8-2ECA70E57C8C@amazon.com>

Vote: yes

?On 11/28/18, 9:27 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Hughes" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

    I hereby nominate Aleksey Shipilev [0] for the role of OpenJDK 8u Reviewer.
    
    He's a active member of many OpenJDK projects, including being
    a reviewer on OpenJDK 9 and up, and a committer to Shenandoah.
    
    Most of his commits have been to OpenJDK 9 and later,
    but there are still a fair number in 8u [1] [2].
    In a similar manner to Andrew Dinn's nomination [3], his lack of reviewer
    status on OpenJDK 8 Updates, while holding it on all later releases,
    seems more a simple case of when he gained JDK reviewership -
    as the same status is conferred on to new JDK releases, but
    not retrospectively to older ones - than a lack of sufficient
    technical qualification.  With the new JDK and JDK-Updates projects
    covering all releases, this is a problem that only really applies
    to the older releases.
    
    Votes are due by the 12th of December, 2018, at 17h00 UTC.
    
    Only current OpenJDK 8u Reviewers [4] are eligible to vote on this
    nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
    list.
    
    For Three-Vote Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
    
    [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#shade
    [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [2] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/log?revcount=200&rev=(author(shade)+or+desc(%22shade%40redhat.com%22))+and+not+merge()
    [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008135.html
    [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u
    [5] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus
    -- 
    Andrew :)
    
    Senior Free Java Software Engineer
    Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
    
    Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
    PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
    Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
    


From hohensee at amazon.com  Thu Nov 29 23:53:01 2018
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:53:01 +0000
Subject: RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout
 the diagnostic option
In-Reply-To: <a26bb278-bd3f-9b4b-26d7-d6c25ade8c85@oracle.com>
References: <d735108a-aa3f-82f6-4f85-430c0c8a71cb@redhat.com>
 <502d07a8-b705-f518-4b86-a67f981c55ca@redhat.com>
 <6f196e03-389e-08d3-9b86-e6b7a56732c0@redhat.com>
 <217c837a-95ed-e8de-256c-2efd68c6466d@redhat.com>
 <cb749411-1c99-1ef3-9415-7adce29823ee@redhat.com>
 <EF716C4E-B504-4340-9590-A1DF2759C07A@amazon.com>
 <a26bb278-bd3f-9b4b-26d7-d6c25ade8c85@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <8B80257D-7966-4834-BCEA-51D71B481DB6@amazon.com>

Point taken. I should read the docs more closely.

Thanks,

Paul

?On 11/26/18, 3:15 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:

    On 27/11/2018 4:09 am, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    > Lgtm too, and +1 on backporting to 11u as well. I'm a bit surprised that the original RFE doesn't have a CSR, since it changed an interface. But, since there was no CSR for the original RFE, imo there's no need for one for backports.
    
    "Interfaces that are experimental or for diagnostic purposes do not need 
    to go through CSR process, but the CSR process may be employed if 
    feedback from the CSR reviewers is desired." [1]
    
    And it was originally a develop flag which is also outside the CSR 
    process (though not mentioned in the CSR FAQ).
    
    Cheers,
    David
    
    [1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr/CSR+FAQs
    
    
    
    > Paul
    > 
    > On 11/26/18, 9:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Zhengyu Gu" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
    > 
    >      Thanks, Aleksey!
    >      
    >      -Zhengyu
    >      
    >      On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
    >      > Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
    >      >
    >      > Thanks,
    >      > -Aleksey
    >      >
    >      > On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
    >      >> Hi Aleksey,
    >      >>
    >      >> Can I take this as reviewed?
    >      >>
    >      >> Thanks,
    >      >>
    >      >> -Zhengyu
    >      >>
    >      >> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
    >      >>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
    >      >>>
    >      >>> -Aleksey
    >      >>>
    >      >>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
    >      >>>> Hi,
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
    >      >>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
    >      >>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>> Thanks,
    >      >>>>
    >      >>>> -Zhengyu
    >      >>>
    >      >>>
    >      >
    >      >
    >      
    > 
    


From rasbold at google.com  Fri Nov 30 00:47:14 2018
From: rasbold at google.com (Chuck Rasbold)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:47:14 -0800
Subject: Result: JDK 8 Updates Committer: Jean Christophe Beyler
Message-ID: <CALFb4Ku-sSE+0qmvY=UmZXE2gxW2xErKoV9YzDWA9NGNSyUTvQ@mail.gmail.com>

Voting for Jean Christophe Beyler (jcbeyler) [1] is now closed.

Yes: 16
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0

According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus [2], this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.

-- Chuck

[1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008160.html
<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-November/008160.html>
[2] https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus

From kevin.walls at oracle.com  Fri Nov 30 09:50:02 2018
From: kevin.walls at oracle.com (Kevin Walls)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:50:02 +0000
Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval for CR 8133984:
 print_compressed_class_space() is only defined in 64-bit VM
Message-ID: <c8ccaa7a-35de-159a-d3a9-07bd01ed7b19@oracle.com>

Hi,

I'd like to request approval to backport from 9 to 8u:

8133984: print_compressed_class_space() is only defined in 64-bit VM
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133984

This fixes a hotspot build failure in 32-bit slowdebug builds.

9 changeset:
URL:   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/f4b9f233b44b

9 review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2015-August/015681.html

This is a clean backport/hg import.

Thanks
Kevin


From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Fri Nov 30 10:55:59 2018
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:55:59 +0000
Subject: [8u communication] Call for new maintainers
In-Reply-To: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
References: <fbcd55e5-234f-82eb-cf95-2c583ad8d41b@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <fa74389b-bfee-d798-804d-3958959f2d02@oracle.com>

Thanks to Andrew Haley and Andrew Hughes for nominating
themselves for the role of JDK 8 Updates Maintainer. I propose
to add them to the current group of Project maintainers.

After that, I plan to work with the current and new maintainers in
addressing the new approval requests in the jdk8u-dev queue.

Regards,
Sean.

On 21/11/18 17:44, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> To help transition this Project to a new Lead, I'd like to invite new 
> non Oracle participants to help in maintainer duties. The primary duty 
> involved from here on is reviewing and making approval decisions on 
> incoming requests which will ultimately end up in the next, non Oracle 
> led, release of this Project (post release of JDK 8u202).
>
> Any candidates putting themselves forward for this role should 
> demonstrate an active history with the Project and should ideally give 
> some background history on their involvement in the Project to date.
>
> If new maintainers are added, an announcement will be made via the 
> Project mailing list.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>