RFD: Draft guidelines for working on jdk8u

Martin Balao mbalao at redhat.com
Thu Feb 7 21:07:15 UTC 2019

On 2/7/19 3:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Comments welcome.

I'd like to propose that for trivial backports/changes (i.e.: typos,
copyright fixes, etc.), a jdk8u reviewer approval is enough to have the
patch in. In case that a reviewer is not sure about the triviality of a
backport/change, other reviewers or maintainer approval may be required.
This would reduce unnecessary overhead I believe.

More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list