openjdk8u211 tag

[Gil Tene]

Given the proposed process for the 8u quarterly releases going forward, I think that 8u212 would we the proper
tag for the actual April release under such a process. [See separate discussion under "Numbering of updates in
future 8u quarterly releases" (e.g. https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-February/008564.html)
where we seem to have a quiet consensus that using the 8uXX2 numbers is the least-bad choice for now]

I guess we could have two tags (8u211 and 8u212) to distinguish the presumably security-related stuff from other
things as has been done traditionally, and just assume that everything tagged 8u211 is also included in the 8u212
release.

Or just one for both, which should probably be 8u212.

Which will be more confusing?

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Comments?
> 
> --
> Andrew Haley
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
> <openjdk8u211 tag.eml>

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Subject: openjdk8u211 tag
> Date: February 26, 2019 at 10:17:51 AM PST
> To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> 
> Noticed it replacing the openjdk8u tag. I thought there wasn’t going to be an OpenJDK 8u211, only a u212?
> 
> Paul