RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images

[Chris Hegarty]

Thanks for reviewing these changes Joe.

On 21/11/14 19:55, huizhe wang wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> The jaxp changes look good as well. Only a couple of debug info in
> javax/xml/datatype/FactoryFinder.java and
> javax/xml/parsers/FactoryFinder.java may be fixed. They were wrong
> originally. You've fixed it in other FactoryFinders.
>        "found in $java.home/jaxp.properties,
>        "found in $java.home/conf/jaxp.properties,

This has been fixed in jigsaw/m2.

-Chris

>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> On 11/20/2014 1:41 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>>> Subject: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
>>> Date: 20 November 2014 21:39:14 GMT
>>> To: jigsaw-dev <jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net>, jdk9-dev
>>> <jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net>, build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
>>> Alan Bateman <alan.bateman at oracle.com>, Alex Buckley
>>> <alex.buckley at oracle.com>, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>,
>>> Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>, Jonathan Gibbons
>>> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>, Karen Kinnear
>>> <karen.kinnear at oracle.com>, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)"
>>> <James.Laskey at oracle.com>, Magnus Ihse Bursie
>>> <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>, Mandy Chung
>>> <mandy.chung at oracle.com>, Mark Reinhold <mark.reinhold at oracle.com>,
>>> Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>, "A. Sundararajan"
>>> <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com>
>>>
>>> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular
>>> Run-Time Images [1].
>>>
>>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes.
>>> Some, possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of
>>> this mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this
>>> review request.
>>>
>>> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can
>>> be seen as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the
>>> early access builds [3].
>>>
>>> Webrevs:
>>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
>>>
>>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion has
>>> been tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments are
>>> welcome, although given the nature of the changes then we might have
>>> to create separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later in
>>> jdk9/dev.
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
>>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/
>>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ea
>