Adding Jemmy v3 to https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/

Erik Greijus erik.greijus at oracle.com
Fri May 4 13:04:23 UTC 2018


I think that’s better. Remember that each of the modules have their own version as well (see the version.properties file for each of them).

Regards
/Erik

> 4 maj 2018 kl. 15:00 skrev Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>:
> 
> Sounds like we need to change the version numbers and artifactId according to Erik's instructions as well?
> 
> So 
> 
> groupId     org.adoptopenjdk
> artifactId   jemmy3
> version      1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> 
> How does that sound Erik?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Martijn
> 
> On 4 May 2018 at 13:19, Patrick Reinhart <patrick at reini.net <mailto:patrick at reini.net>> wrote:
> Hello together,
> 
> I went over the jemmy codebase so far, that the compilation succeeds and a push to the maven repo is possible:
> 
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~reinhapa/reviews/jemmy/webrev/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~reinhapa/reviews/jemmy/webrev/>
> 
> The following changes include mostly the following:
> 
> Javadoc
> The changes removed all comments, that did not provide any informations. In those cases where the comments where not complete the I added  „todo document“ as text to pass the minimal build requirements.
> 
> groupId/artifactId
> I changed the groupId to „org.adoptopenjdk“ and all artifactId values to be lower case and dash separated:
> 
> The current state of the changes will build an 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT version so far.
> 
> Before I we can publish an initial version, we must clarify the correct license and update the according header files. For the moment I took the latest GPL license for my local build and its initial tests.
> 
> 
> -Patrick
> 
> 
> > Am 04.05.2018 um 13:38 schrieb Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>:
> > 
> > Awesome, that makes life a lot easier - OK, now to get X11 running on the build boxes we want to pass tests.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> > 
> > On 4 May 2018 at 12:01, Erik Greijus <erik.greijus at oracle.com <mailto:erik.greijus at oracle.com>> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Sorry for the late answer.
> > As for JemmySWT.jar it is platform independent (it relies on the platform dependent SWT library  - which is needed to build the project, and later on to actually use Jemmy).
> > You only need to build and make available the four jars as they are.
> > 
> > Best regards
> > /Erik
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> 4 maj 2018 kl. 10:39 skrev Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>:
> >> 
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> 1.) I'm OK with the groupId being org.adoptopenjdk - but that may cause some confusion if we do not actually host the source code as well.  Not too big an issue if we explain this in the POM file
> >> 
> >> 2.) Thank you Patrick (what an awesome co-incidence)!
> >> 
> >> 3.) I'm totally OK with it being version 3.0.0, so I'd recommend setting the version to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT to start with.
> >> 
> >> I'd still like to understand if we need a SWT JAR for each platform, is someone able to answer that?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martijn
> >> 
> >> On 3 May 2018 at 21:17, Marcus Hirt <marcus.hirt at oracle.com <mailto:marcus.hirt at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> So, we’re suggesting to use adoptopenjdk.org <http://adoptopenjdk.org/> as groupid and change the camel case module names to lower case and dashes. Patrick is also fixing the javadocs, as that must be done to publish the source Jars. I think Patrick will be back with big wonderful patch soon. :)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Also, would it be okay to not have v3 in the name, but rather just set the version to 3.0.0?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Kind regards,
> >> 
> >> Marcus
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
> >> Date: Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 22:13
> >> To: Erik Greijus <erik.greijus at oracle.com <mailto:erik.greijus at oracle.com>>
> >> Cc: "Alexandre (Shura) Iline" <alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>>, "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>" <adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>>, <jemmy-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:jemmy-dev at openjdk.java.net>>, dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at oracle.com <mailto:dalibor.topic at oracle.com>>, Marcus Hirt <marcus.hirt at oracle.com <mailto:marcus.hirt at oracle.com>>, Patrick Reinhart <patrick.reinhart at gmail.com <mailto:patrick.reinhart at gmail.com>>
> >> Subject: Re: Adding Jemmy v3 to https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/ <https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I've made a little further progress with the new Maven based Jemmy build (https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/jemmy/label_exp=linux&&x64&&hg/4/ <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/jemmy/label_exp=linux&&x64&&hg/4/>).  I have a few questions / comments.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 1.) The JemmySWT-1.0.jar artifact, is that platform independent or do we need to create a JemmySWT-linux-1.0.jar, JemmySWT-mac-1.0.jar, JemmySWT-windows-1.0.jar?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 2.) I still need to figure out how to bring up the Linux UI for our build node to pass the tests, I'm skipping for now.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 3.) Releasing to Maven Central is usually two-fold: SNAPSHOTS and release versions.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> * In terms of SNAPSHOTS we could could likely push on every build
> >> 
> >> * In terms of releases we can add a release task (or a release job if we Jenkins pipeline pro it) that can be manaully executed when the Jemmy team decides to cut a release
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> My suggestion is that you:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 1.) Change the version numbers to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> 
> >> 2.) We get a SNAPSHOT release out to Maven Central (and practice getting past the OSSRH gatekeeper)
> >> 
> >> 3.) We perform a formal release (1.0.0) and push that to Maven Central
> >> 
> >> 4.) The version will auto bump to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT afterwards and can be manually changed to whatever you need
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I notice that `org.jemmy.v3` is your groupID, that might be OK but the OSSRH gatekeeper might expect a org.jemmy email address.  I'm not 100% on this so I've cruelly dragged in Patrick Reinhart who's done Maven Central deploys for other Adopt projects in the past, sorry Patrick!
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martijn
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 13 April 2018 at 08:40, Erik Greijus <erik.greijus at oracle.com <mailto:erik.greijus at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > 11 apr. 2018 kl. 18:41 skrev Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > The Jemmy build project is here:
> >> > https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Dependencies/job/jemmy/ <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Dependencies/job/jemmy/>
> >> >
> >> > If managed to get a mostly successful run and have produced a jemmy.tar.gz
> >> > file that contains the 3 jar files (jemmyCore.jar, JemmyAWTInput.jar,
> >> > JemmyBrowser.jar).  Now for some questions :-)
> >> >
> >> > 1.) I'm running this on Linux x86 - since we're replying on an SWT lib, do
> >> > platform specific jemmy's need to be built?
> >> 
> >> Yes. The JemmySWT jar should have been built as well (./SWT/JemmySWT/target/...)
> >> 
> >> > 2.) Some of the tests naturally failed (Robot testing the UI), I'll see if
> >> > I can get that Jenkins node to fire up an X11 so that those tests can pass.
> >> 
> >> That would be good.
> >> 
> >> > 3.) Can folks please grab the tar.gz from the latest artifacts link
> >> > <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Dependencies/job/jemmy/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Dependencies/job/jemmy/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/>>
> >> > and let me know if that's how they expect it to be named and whether the
> >> > layout of the contents is acceptable
> >> 
> >> I miss the JemmySWT jar file mentioned above.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > 4.) Versioning / naming - should I be building off a known good tag?  Do we
> >> > want the tip/commit number to be part of the artifact name?
> >> >
> >> > It should build on an SCM change and weekly as well
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Martijn
> >> >
> >> > On 11 April 2018 at 09:56, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Cool, I'll go with what I have as a working build for now and adjust to
> >> >> use the test target when that change comes in, and then perhaps move to the
> >> >> Maven build later.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Martijn
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10 April 2018 at 21:26, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <
> >> >> alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Apr 10, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi Alexandre,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm using JTReg from the AdoptOpenJDK Build Farm (
> >> >>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/all/job/jtreg/ <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/all/job/jtreg/>) in particular
> >> >>> the jtreg-4.2-b12.tar.gz binary.  That appears to have cleared that issue
> >> >>> up (we did have broken binaries for a bit).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If I now run
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ant -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3.jar bu
> >> >>> ild-dependecies-impl
> >> >>> ant -Djtreg.home=/Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/jtreg/
> >> >>> -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3.jar te
> >> >>> st-dependecies-impl
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Then I get a passing build!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ---------
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Onto the next issue! If I run just:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ant -Djtreg.home=/Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/jtreg/
> >> >>> -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3.jar test
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Then I get compile errors like:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> compile-test:
> >> >>>    [javac] Compiling 7 source files to /Users/karianna/Documents/work
> >> >>> space/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/SWT/JemmySWT/build/test
> >> >>>    [javac] /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/
> >> >>> v3/SWT/JemmySWT/test/org/jemmy/swt/ItemsTest.java:84: error: cannot find
> >> >>> symbol
> >> >>>    [javac]         prnt.lookup(new ByTextItem<TabItem>("Table")).
> >> >>> wrap().mouse().click();
> >> >>>    [javac]                         ^
> >> >>>    [javac]   symbol:   class ByTextItem
> >> >>>    [javac]   location: class ItemsTest
> >> >>>    [javac] /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/
> >> >>> v3/SWT/JemmySWT/test/org/jemmy/swt/ItemsTest.java:92: error: cannot find
> >> >>> symbol
> >> >>>    [javac]         prnt.lookup(new ByTextItem<TabItem>(tab)).wrap
> >> >>> ().mouse().click();
> >> >>>    [javac]                         ^
> >> >>>    [javac]   symbol:   class ByTextItem
> >> >>>    [javac]   location: class ItemsTest
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This, I believe, is a bug which is going to be addressed by the review in
> >> >>> progress: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jemmy-dev/2 <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jemmy-dev/2>
> >> >>> 018-April/000080.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Shura
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ------------
> >> >>>
> >> 
> >> >>> A *README.txt* for building at the root of the project and a .*hgignore*
> >> 
> >> >>> file would also be nice to haves.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ------------
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm now going to source a Linux 4.3 SWT lib and see if I can get Jemmy
> >> >>> building nightly on our build farm.  I'm also very interested in seeing the
> >> >>> Maven support go in :-).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Martijn
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 9 April 2018 at 18:52, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <
> >> >>> alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Do you happen to have full stack trace of that?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also, how to I get JTReg which are you using?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The reported missing method would be a part of JTReg, clearly.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The other thing is you should probably be ok with just running ant ….
> >> >>>> test. “test” target is coming from http://hg.openjdk.java.ne <http://hg.openjdk.java.ne/>
> >> >>>> t/code-tools/jemmy/v3/file/898c9e02c8c9/make/build_template.xml.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Shura
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 6:47 AM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Hi Alexandre,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I got a little further (This is using Java 1.8.0_162).  Once I set my
> >> >>>> swt.jar and jtreg.home I was able to run:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ant -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3
> >> >>>> check-dependecies-impl
> >> >>>> ant -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3
> >> >>>> build-dependecies-impl
> >> >>>> ant -Dswt.jar=lib/org.eclipse.swt.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-4.3
> >> >>>> -Djtreg.home=/Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJD
> >> 
> >> >>>> K_Projects/jtreg/ test-dependecies-impl
> >> 
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The first two execute OK but then the test gives me the test failure of:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> test:
> >> >>>>     [exec] Directory "/Users/karianna/Documents/wor
> >> >>>> kspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/core/JemmyBrowser/build/test_wd" not
> >> >>>> found: creating
> >> >>>>     [exec] Directory "/Users/karianna/Documents/wor
> >> >>>> kspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/core/JemmyBrowser/build/test_report"
> >> >>>> not found: creating
> >> >>>>     [exec] runner starting test: org/jemmy/browser/PropPanelTest.java
> >> >>>>     [exec] runner finished test: org/jemmy/browser/PropPanelTest.java
> >> >>>>     [exec] Error. Unexpected error caught from test
> >> >>>> org/jemmy/browser/PropPanelTest.java: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> >> >>>> com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.JDK_Version.compareTo(Lcom/su
> >> >>>> n/javatest/regtest/agent/JDK_Version;)I
> >> >>>>     [exec] Test results: error: 1
> >> >>>>     [exec] Report written to /Users/karianna/Documents/work
> >> >>>> space/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/core/JemmyBrowser/build/test_
> >> >>>> report/html/report.html
> >> >>>>     [exec] Results written to /Users/karianna/Documents/work
> >> >>>> space/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/core/JemmyBrowser/build/test_wd
> >> >>>>     [exec] Error: Some tests failed or other problems occurred.
> >> >>>>     [exec] Result: 3
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Any ideas?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FYI - I'm still running this locally on my Mac OS X box until I get a
> >> >>>> clean build so I know the minimum steps for the build farm job.  Note to
> >> >>>> self that the build box will need to provide a platform specific SWT lib
> >> >>>> (Linux x86).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>> Martijn
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 28 March 2018 at 21:43, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <
> >> >>>> alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Now including aliases and more recipients..
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <
> >> >>>>> alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Martijn Verburg <
> >> >>>>> martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hi Alexandre,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> OK, So I naively tried to run ant in the SWT/JemmySWT folder and
> >> >>>>> that failed with:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3/SWT/JemmySWT/build.xml:33:
> >> >>>>> Please specify swt.jar
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> You do need the SWT library to build SWT.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> this is what I just did:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ~/JDK/hg/jemmy/v3/SWT/JemmySWT$ ant -Dswt.jar=/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt_3.8.2.jar
> >> >>>>> jar
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I clearly need to provide a README. Will do.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Shura
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Then I actually bothered to read the build.xml file and saw the
> >> >>>>> build-dependecies-impl target, so I ran ant build-dependecies-impl which
> >> >>>>> seemed to build:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3
> >> >>>>> /core/JemmyCore/build/JemmyCore.jar
> >> >>>>>>> /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3
> >> >>>>> /core/JemmyAWTInput/build/JemmyAWTInput.jar
> >> >>>>>>> /Users/karianna/Documents/workspace/AdoptOpenJDK_Projects/v3
> >> >>>>> /core/JemmyBrowser/build/JemmyBrowser.jar
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Then I ran ant test-dependecies-impl and it wanted my jtreg.home set
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Before I shave more Yaks, is this the right direction to be going in?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>>>> Martijn
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On 28 March 2018 at 20:43, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <
> >> >>>>> alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> Martijn,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Jemmy v3 consists of several project which depend on each other.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> If, besides hosting the source, the intension is to build it, you
> >> >>>>> need to build projects which are in use by others who would be coming to
> >> >>>>> AdoptOpenJDK for binaries.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> At this point of time, from what I know, JemmySWT is what is needed.
> >> >>>>> Ant build scripts are constructed in a way so that by while JemmySWT is
> >> >>>>> build, the dependences are also built, you should have no problem with that.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Binaries would, then, simply include all jar files create after the
> >> >>>>> build. The jar files will be: */*/build/*.jar
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Shura
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:35 AM, Martijn Verburg <
> >> >>>>> martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Hi Dalibor,
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> We're shifting the code tools off Cloudbees to the new
> >> >>>>> adoptiopenjdk.net <http://adoptiopenjdk.net/> build farm.  I'm more than happy to add it, a quick
> >> >>>>> Q:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jemmy/v3/ <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jemmy/v3/> gives me:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x   7 karianna  staff   238 28 Mar 19:30 .
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  44 karianna  staff  1496 28 Mar 19:30 ..
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  13 karianna  staff   442 28 Mar 19:30 .hg
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x   3 karianna  staff   102 28 Mar 19:30 .jcheck
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x   4 karianna  staff   136 28 Mar 19:30 SWT
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x   6 karianna  staff   204 28 Mar 19:30 core
> >> >>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x   3 karianna  staff   102 28 Mar 19:30 make
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> but I can't see what the canonical entry point to build it is.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I'll sign up to jemmy-dev and x-post there shortly.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>>>>> Martijn
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On 28 March 2018 at 17:02, dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at oracle.com <mailto:dalibor.topic at oracle.com>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> Hi Martijn,
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> would you be able to add the Jemmy v3 repo at
> >> >>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jemmy/v3/ <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jemmy/v3/> to
> >> >>>>> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/ <https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/> ?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> cheers,
> >> >>>>>>>> dalibor topic
> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com <http://www.oracle.com/>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
> >> 
> >> >>>>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214 <+494089091214>> | Mobile:
> >> >>>>> +491737185961
> >> >>>>>>>> <tel:+491737185961 <+491737185961>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
> >> >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=K%C3%BChneh%C3%B6fe+5+%7C+22761+Hamburg&entry=gmail&source=g <https://maps.google.com/?q=K%C3%BChneh%C3%B6fe+5+%7C+22761+Hamburg&entry=gmail&source=g>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
> >> >>>>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992
> >> >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Riesstr.+25,+D-80992&entry=gmail&source=g <https://maps.google.com/?q=Riesstr.+25,+D-80992&entry=gmail&source=g>>
> >> >>>>> München
> >> >>>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
> >> >>>>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
> >> >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Hertogswetering+163/167,+3543+AS+Utrecht,+Niederlande&entry=gmail&source=g <https://maps.google.com/?q=Hertogswetering+163/167,+3543+AS+Utrecht,+Niederlande&entry=gmail&source=g>>
> >> 
> >> >>>>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
> >> >>>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to
> >> >>>>> developing
> >> >>>>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



More information about the jemmy-dev mailing list