Question on Implied readability

Ali Ebrahimi ali.ebrahimi1781 at
Mon Nov 2 23:32:04 UTC 2015


On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at>

> On 02/11/2015 20:02, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
> Thanks, I see the issue. The reason it didn't duplicate for me is because
> I hadn't dropped the requires
> So the bug is implied readability across layers when the same named module
> exists in multiple layers. In this case should read at 1.
> The (@2) is the same configuration as is confusing the
> code. We'll need to fix this.
> So, you say can not read and why?
Based on implied readability module implicitly reads, in
other word have requires;
and because is co-layer with, so
module should reads override for
How this specified in spec?

> -Alan


Best Regards,
Ali Ebrahimi

More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list