RFR: 8139430

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Thu Nov 19 17:49:38 UTC 2015

On 19/11/2015 16:40, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
> Yes, sorry.
> Since the methods do not have any work to complete before interrupting and also methods are not used anywhere currently, I assume re-throwing the InterruptedException is a better choice.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8139430/webrev.07/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/management/ThreadMXBeanTool.java.html
If handling InterruptedException isn't a burden in these tests then it 
should be okay. Also this is probably a better anyway if you want to 
give jtreg a chance to kill a test when it goes bad (say where the 
target thread is looping and the waitXXX methods will not otherwise 


More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list