8156989: Trailing empty element in classpath ignored
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Mon May 16 20:11:36 UTC 2016
On 05/16/2016 12:36 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> >For tests then Jon will be pushing the updated MineField to jdk9/dev soon. We need to go over the new options and get javac and the runtime consistent. I think we want it so that empty elements in the new options are ignored, leaving class path for legacy reasons.
> Yes we should add new tests to ensure the javac and runtime consistency of the new options.
> Mandy
To give context, the "minefield" term refers to a specific complex test
in the langtools repo to compare option handling between java and javac.
The conceptual minefield has forked. I have been working on a new
minefield framework to support minefield-type tests for all the new
module-related JDK 9 options, but it does not adapt well to the original
JDK 5-era MineField test. So that test will continue, in some modified
form, and separately, we will have a new test framework to support new
tests and test cases.
-- Jon
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list