[jmm-dev] Non-core-model issues status
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Sat Sep 6 12:04:54 UTC 2014
On 09/02/2014 05:07 PM, Hans Boehm wrote:
> > 2. We introduce and spec a reachabilityFence(Object x) method, and add
> > wording about it in JLS sec 12.6. Further suggestions for doing more
> > are still welcome. (Also, the method name is still up for grabs.
> > Except that the name "keepAlive" is known to be too confusing
> > to consider.)
> I thought we were focusing primarily on an annotation to declare fields that are
> cleaned up by finalizers, so that accessing such fields inhibits elimination of
> "dead" references. I continue to believe that an API call by itself will not
> fix the problem.
Sorry for not being very consistent about this.
The more I look into the practical problems people face using
finalize, the less I believe that we can do anything that would
lead anyone to ever recommend that people use it outside of a few
niche contexts that already require lots of care and almost
always involve synchronization patterns that avoid need for
reachabilityFence/keepAlive. Still, reliance on coincidental
properties of synchronize(x) seems like a too big of a flaw not
See for example the core-libs-dev discussion going on among
JDK and other library developers. Including:
More information about the jmm-dev