Draft JPMS Public Review specification
rfscholte at apache.org
Wed Mar 8 22:48:13 UTC 2017
I agree with David. There are still quite some topics marked as "Proposal
posted or discussion active" of which I don't know what the final
resolution would be. And for a few I know they will have impact on other
topics as well.
I will go through the list and return with a concrete list of remarks.
On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:05:01 +0100, David M. Lloyd
<david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:
> Right now a Public Review definitely does not seem appropriate given
> that at least some of the EG still sees major problems with the draft,
> whereas it sends a message that there is consensus when there is not.
> Given the fact that there still are significant issues outstanding and
> disagreement within the EG, it seems likely to me that a at least a
> second Public Review would need to be submitted anyway, one way or
> another. In this light, I think it makes sense to wait at least until
> there's some semblance of consensus among the EG before posting the
> public review.
> On 03/07/2017 10:50 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>> At this point in time the draft specification appears to achieve the
>> of this JSR. We have a small and shrinking number of open issues on the
>> list , and I expect the resolution of those issues to require at most
>> modest adjustments to the final draft. I therefore intend to submit the
>> following draft to the JCP PMO to be posted for Public Review:
>> Please let me know by 17:00 UTC next Tuesday, 14 March if you think any
>> changes are required, or if you need more time for review.
>> - Mark
>>  http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues
More information about the jpms-spec-observers