Java Platform Module System (JSR 376) EG minutes: 2017/5/18
Stu Hood
stuhood at twitter.com
Thu May 25 03:29:56 UTC 2017
Thanks for these notes! I wanted to highlight one quote here that seems
relevant to two important issues.
Under #CompilationWithConcealedPackages:
> Brian recapped the issue saying that there is agreement in spirit that the
> identity of a class should include provenance.
This is extremely interesting, because if including the module in a class's
identity is feasible/agreeable (in more than just "spirit"!), then it seems
like it would resolve both #CompilationWithConcealedPackages
and #AvoidConcealedPackageConflicts in one fell swoop. Collisions between
classes defined in different modules would be impossible at both compile
and runtime.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:40 AM, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:
> I've published the minutes from last Thursday's meeting, here:
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/minutes/2017-05-18
>
> - Mark
>
--
@stuhood <https://twitter.com/stuhood>
More information about the jpms-spec-observers
mailing list