Yes, that is precisely the problem. Freedom 0 is not granted by GPLv2. On Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Dr Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote: > If true, it doesn't protect the four freedoms in this case as freedom > 0 is 'the freedom to run the program for any purpose' > (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html)