Please review FunctionsTest PredicatesTest improvement to eliminate code coverage gap

[Mike Duigou]

I've now reviewed it and will push the patch.

Thanks!

On Jan 14 2013, at 12:35 , Paul Sandoz wrote:

> Hi Amy,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> Thanks for the patch. Do you want me to commit this for you?
> 
> Paul.
> 
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Amy Lu <amy.lu at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> This is improvement for FunctionsTest and PredicatesTest to 
>> eliminatecode coverage gap in java.util.function.Functions and Predicates.
>> 
>> Please review:
>> webrev: 
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5812451/yl153753/lambda_test/webrev.00/index.html
>> test results: 
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5812451/yl153753/lambda_test/results/test-ng/test-reports/index.html
>> code coverage: 100% 
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5812451/yl153753/lambda_test/jcov_result/report/index.html
>> 
>> If jira Issue needed, should I create it under JDK core-libs/java.util, 
>> any special labels needed for lambda(test) changes?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>> 
>> 
>