FlatMapper

[Tim Peierls]

Yes, mapInto is better than flattenInto.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com>wrote:

> Is mapInto better than flattenInto?  Still trivial to change at this point.
>
>
> On 2/21/2013 11:33 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
>
>> Tardy, but:  the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with
>> "mapInto".  Sure, you can map /multiple, /but that fact just didn't seem
>>
>> overly necessary to force into the name.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
>> <mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>**> wrote:
>>
>>     flattenInto gets my vote
>>
>>     On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr
>>     <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
>>
>>         On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>
>>             flattenInto seems the best so far.
>>
>>
>>         +1
>>
>>         Rémi
>>
>>
>>             On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
>>
>>                 On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax
>>                 <forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>
>>                 <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>>>
>>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>                      mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me,
>>                 mapAndFlat ?
>>
>>
>>                 No, has to be a verb.
>>
>>                 I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping
>>                 part to be implied
>>                 by the type name.
>>
>>                 --tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. |kevinb at google.com
>> <mailto:kevinb at google.com>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130221/15b80fd2/attachment-0001.html