brian.goetz at oracle.com
Fri Jun 28 08:29:46 PDT 2013
Right, but remember this is not a method for general users. This is a
method for libraries and frameworks. The people who use this method
will understand that parallelism is a dynamic property of a stream,
rather than a different kind of stream. So I don't expect it to be
On 6/28/2013 11:27 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 04:18 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> Then we would cross that bridge when we get there!
> I've always found that a method call with true/or false in the arguments
> not something very readable.
>> On 6/28/2013 6:20 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2013 10:43 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>>> A possible minor API cleanup:
>>>> For each pair of low-level methods stream() and parallelStream() in
>>>> StreamSupport, we could combine these into a single method that takes
>>>> an additional boolean isParallel argument. This matches the
>>>> underlying implementation they call anyway, and simplifies callers
>>>> like concat, which now does:
>>>> return (a.isParallel() || b.isParallel())
>>>> ? StreamSupport.parallelStream(split)
>>>> : StreamSupport.stream(split);
>>> What if we add a third kind of stream in the future ?
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts