Transitioning JSR-335 to JCP 2.8 -- EG approval needed

Zakharov, Vladimir Vladimir.Zakharov at gs.com
Wed Sep 26 13:25:38 PDT 2012


Yes

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
See http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/global_email for important risk disclosures, conflicts of interest and other terms and conditions relating to this e-mail and your reliance on information contained in it.  This message may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message.  See http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/email for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication.  If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. 


-----Original Message-----
From: lambda-spec-experts-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:lambda-spec-experts-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Brian Goetz
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:07 PM
To: lambda-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Transitioning JSR-335 to JCP 2.8 -- EG approval needed

The Lmabda JSR was originally submitted in November 2010, under the
rules of JCP 2.7.  When JCP 2.8 (JSR 348) was approved in October 2011
[1], Oracle publicly committed to convert all in-flight JSRs led by
Oracle to JCP 2.8.

To convert an in-flight JSR to 2.8 requires the EG members to agree to 
the change.  Would each of the JSR-335 EG members as listed on [2] 
please indicate your agreement or disagreement by responding to this 
message with a "Yes" or "No", on-list.


[1] https://blogs.oracle.com/pcurran/entry/no_more_smoke_filled_rooms
[2] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=335



More information about the lambda-spec-observers mailing list