Fwd: JEP proposed to target JDK 17: 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline
philip.race at oracle.com
Fri Mar 5 23:09:00 UTC 2021
Perhaps it will be more a case of basking than soaking :-)
We aren't really done with this one quite yet however we are already
thinking about FX with timing TBD.
On 3/5/21 2:59 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> Is a JavaFX version up next, or will you let this Swing pipeline soak
> for a bit first?
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:54 PM Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com
> <mailto:philip.race at oracle.com>> wrote:
> If these two end up being within days or a week or so of each other I
> don't think it reasonable to suddenly put a stopper on the
> to account for that.
> And we actually touch on this in the JEP
> Go to the end and under "Risks and Assumptions" you will find :
> >We did very limited (sanity) testing of the current x64 binaries
> on Apple Silicon.
> >No port of the JDK to Apple Silicon is yet available to support
> On 3/5/21 2:47 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > The macOS Metal pipeline will very likely go into the jdk mainline
> > repo before the macOS aarch64 port (also under review) is
> > In any case, once both are in mainline, then I would expect early
> > access builds of macOS for aarch64 to work with the Metal pipeline.
> > -- Kevin
> > On 3/5/2021 2:32 PM, Konstantin Bulenkov wrote:
> >> Congrats!
> >> Do we have any specific plans on building aarch64 versions for
> the Early
> >> Access program? Apple is going to stop producing computers on
> >> chipset
> >> completely in 1,5-2 years.
> >> Konstantin
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> From: <mark.reinhold at oracle.com <mailto:mark.reinhold at oracle.com>>
> >> Date: Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:08 PM
> >> Subject: Re: JEP proposed to target JDK 17: 382: New macOS
> >> Pipeline
> >> To: <jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
> >> Hearing no objections, I’ve targeted this JEP to JDK 17.
> >> - Mark
More information about the lanai-dev