January 2023 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Jan 2 08:14:53 UTC 2023
Ending: Tue Jan 31 20:42:50 UTC 2023
Messages: 185

• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE   Lance Andersen
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v4]   Lance Andersen
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v4]   Lance Andersen
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Lance Andersen
• RFR: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @since tags   Lance Andersen
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v4]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v5]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v6]   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Matthias Baesken
• Integrated: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area   Matthias Baesken
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v4]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v6]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8299475: Enhance SocketException by cause where it is missing in net and nio area [v3]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v4]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299976: Initialize static fields in Net eagerly   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v9]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v11]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v12]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299976: Initialize static fields in Net eagerly [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v9]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v14]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v16]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v16]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v17]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v2]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v4]   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alan Bateman
• xxxDispatcher not marking FileDescriptors as invalid   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alan Bateman
• RFR: JDK-8300912: Update java/nio/MappedByteBuffer/PmemTest.java to run on x86_64 only   Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor [v2]   ExE Boss
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v3]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v6]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v7]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v8]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v9]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v10]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v11]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v9]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v12]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v13]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v14]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v15]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v14]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v16]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v17]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v16]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @since tags   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8297814: (fs) Re-visit Path.getExtension return value [v3]   Brian Burkhalter
• Integrated: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @since tags   Brian Burkhalter
• Integrated: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v17]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   Brian Burkhalter
• Integrated: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v3]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v3]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v2]   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v4]   Brian Burkhalter
• Integrated: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction)   Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @since tags   Iris Clark
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor [v2]   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor [v3]   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor [v4]   Archie L. Cobbs
• RFR: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   Jie Fu
• RFR: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   Jie Fu
• RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v2]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v5]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v4]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v9]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v16]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v17]   David Holmes
• RFR: 8300942: JDK-8299684 breaks x86 build   David Holmes
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v14]   David Holmes
• RFR: JDK-8300912: Update java/nio/MappedByteBuffer/PmemTest.java to run on x86_64 only   Bill Huang
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket   Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket [v2]   Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket [v2]   Daniel Jeliński
• Integrated: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket   Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8278268 - (ch) InputStream returned by Channels.newInputStream should have fast path for FileChannel targets [v17]   Markus KARG
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base [v2]   Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly [v17]   Ioi Lam
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket   Michael McMahon
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket   Michael McMahon
• RFR: 6914801: IPv6 unavailable if stdin is a socket [v2]   Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8299187: Ensure safe publication of name in ByteOrder [v2]   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299187: Ensure safe publication of name in ByteOrder [v3]   Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8299187: (bf) ByteOrder.name should be declared final   Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8299193: (bf) Buffer.capacity should be declared final   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v2]   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v2]   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v3]   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE [v4]   Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299976: Initialize static fields in Net eagerly   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299976: Initialize static fields in Net eagerly [v2]   Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8299976: Initialize static fields in Net eagerly   Per Minborg
• RFR: 8299193: Declare Buffer.capacity final   Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8299187: Ensure safe publication of name in ByteOrder [v2]   Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8299187: Ensure safe publication of name in ByteOrder [v3]   Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alfonso² Peterssen
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alfonso² Peterssen
• RFR: 8298658: Platform-specific type leaks to platform independent code.   Alfonso² Peterssen
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base   Claes Redestad
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base [v2]   Claes Redestad
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base [v2]   Claes Redestad
• Integrated: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base   Claes Redestad
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base [v2]   Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int) [v3]   Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly   Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Uwe Schindler
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Preconditions.checkIndex(int, int, BiFunction) [v2]   Uwe Schindler
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Vyom Tewari
• RFR: 8300647: Miscellaneous hashCode improvements in java.base [v2]   Sergey Tsypanov
• RFR: 8299982: (bf) Buffer.checkIndex(int, int) should use Objects.checkIndex(int, int)   Sergey Tsypanov
• xxxDispatcher not marking FileDescriptors as invalid   Radim Vansa
• Withdrawn: 8296546: Add @spec tags to API   duke

Last message date: Tue Jan 31 20:42:50 UTC 2023
Archived on: Tue Jan 31 20:42:57 UTC 2023

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...