Proposal to move default style-class from Control to SkinBase
tom.schindl at bestsolution.at
Wed Aug 7 14:00:58 PDT 2013
Oh and one more thing: IIRC you can run e.g. less in rhino so feeding it
a less file with -fx properties should get you css file which you can
pass on to FX.
On 07.08.13 22:56, Tom Schindl wrote:
> If I get your complain right what you want has nothing to do with CSS
> but you are requesting that the complete FX API is remodeled, CSS is
> simply a way to set properties of your Nodes in the SceneGraph, in a
> none intrusive way.
> You need to differiate between CSS as a language and the properties one
> can set on DOM/SceneGraph-Nodes.
>>From the selector point (language) of view FX-CSS support all important
> selector types, but because the nodes in the DOM (=SceneGraph in FX) are
> different you have other properties.
> So if you invent the same node-types you have on the web (lets face it
> there's only a handful of them most important are most likely div,span)
> and give them the same properties you know from the web you can copy
> your Web-CSS stylesheet to your FX-Application.
> On 07.08.13 22:41, Pedro Duque Vieira wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> I'm not going to directly answer your question but I'm rather gonna touch
>> on a problem I see regarding JavaFX CSS. Forgive me for not directly
>> sticking to the subject of your email.
>> The issue I see is that JavaFX CSS significantly differs from W3C CSS, that
>> is the CSS that is used on the web.
>> I've already touch this subject before but didn't have much answer from
>> this mailing list. The reason why I bring it back again is that the more I
>> do web development the more this seems unappropriated.
>> Having JavaFX CSS differ from W3C CSS has the following disadvantages:
>> - Designers coming from web development (they are the majority) will
>> struggle with JavaFX CSS
>> - Cannot use CSS pre-processors like SASS, LESS, Compass thus missing
>> out on this tooling that significantly enhances CSS. You can do really cool
>> stuff with Compass.
>> - Cannot reuse what already is out there on the web. And there are a
>> huge amount of examples there.
>> - Re-inventing the wheel. My personal opinion is that you should try to
>> harness the work that already exists especially when you have few
>> resources. People have already spent some time on this, tested and fixed
>> issues with it. So why not "stand on the shoulder of giants".
>> I'm not saying you should introduce CSS layout, that is a headache and a
>> problem that they're trying to solve in CSS3, but all the rest can be
>> changed to be the same as CSS. You can even have both working side by side,
>> the current JavaFX CSS and a newer more W3C conforming CSS so that you
>> don't break existing apps.
>> I don't see any advantage of having a CSS different from W3C one, if I was
>> going to make one different I would have created a newer more simpler
>> language to express an apps appearance. Not used CSS.
>> Thanks, best regards,
More information about the openjfx-dev