RFR (M): 8024265: Enable new build on AIX (top level part)
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Thu Sep 12 06:46:59 PDT 2013
Thank you Erik!
Vladimir, could you please push
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8024265.v4 (before we get
the next merge conflicts:)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com> wrote:
> Magnus left for the day, but I'm ok with you pushing this to the stage area.
> On 2013-09-12 14:29, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> Hi Magnus,
>> thanks for doing "JDK-8024665 Move open changes for JDK-8020411 to
>> closed source"!
>> Can you now please give Vladimir the GO signal (from a
>> build-perspective) to integrate my changes (from
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8024265.v4/) into the
>> ppc-aix-port/stage repository?
>> Actually my changes revert 8020411 as well. This means that when
>> 8024665 will flow into our staging repository, we would have to
>> manually resolve platform.m4 to our version which we checked in, but
>> that should be OK.
>> I'd really appreciate if we could push my change now, otherwise we
>> would have to wait another couple of weeks until 8024665 goes from
>> build -> main -> stage.
>> Thank you and best regards,
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
>> <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 2013-09-11 18:45, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>> Argh! It conflicts with 8020411
>>>> (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8020411/webrev.root.01/) from your
>>>> last jdk8->stage synchronisation.
>>>> @Magnus, Erik : it seems that '8020411' needed a similar 'feature' to
>>>> my actual change but did it without abstracting over the name of the
>>>> "compilers target bits" flag name vs. its actual value. Unfortunately
>>>> all the users of the change 8020411 are in the closed sources. I'd
>>>> really like to stay with my solution (because I think that's the most
>>>> general one) and resolve the merge conflicts with 8020411 by
>>>> eliminating TARGET_BITS_FLAG which can now be replaced by
>>> I see. When looking more closely in the fix for JDK-8020411, it turned
>>> that it could do with some improvements:
>>> a) since it really only applies to the closed sources, it could (and
>>> be done only in the closed sources.
>>> b) it was actually incorrect, since it removed the ADDED_*FLAGS
>>> which are needed for later use to check for incorrect additions to
>>> I am sorry your patch has become caught in this messiness. :(
>>> I think the best way forward is that I create a new patch, that reverts
>>> JDK-8020411 in the open sources and re-implements them in the closed
>>> sources. I agree that your solution is better, and what we should have in
>>> the open sources. You shouldn't have to care about the TARGET_BITS_FLAG,
>>> is an internal hack.
>>> I'll start working on it immediately.
More information about the ppc-aix-port-dev