RFR 8217657: Move the test for default value of jdk.includeInExceptions into own test

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi Sean,

thanks for looking at this. I agree. Will remove othervm...

Best regards
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2019 17:43
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; OpenJDK Dev list
> <security-dev at openjdk.java.net>; OpenJDK Network Dev list <net-
> dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: RFR 8217657: Move the test for default value of
> jdk.includeInExceptions into own test
> 
> I don't think you really need to run the test with the othervm flag,
> unless you are concerned other tests may be setting this property and
> (incorrectly) not running in a separate VM, which would be a bug in my
> opinion. Well, then maybe you should run it in othervm just in case.
> Otherwise, looks ok to me.
> 
> --Sean
> 
> On 1/23/19 11:05 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please review a small test update.
> >
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217657
> >
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8217657.0/
> >
> > I'd like to move the test for the correct default value of security
> > property "jdk.includeInExceptions" into an own testcase in the
> > jdk.security area. This seems a bit more natural than to hide this check
> > in a java/net specific test and will help finding/maintaining tests when
> > the (default-)value for that property changes. For instance new values
> > get added or other OpenJDK builds have different defaults (e.g.
> SAPMachine).
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Christoph
> >