JDK-8004127

[Staffan Larsen]

Sure, but we don’t assign owners until someone actively works on it so I put it as Unassigned.

(I didn’t understand that this was the question in the original conversation).

/Staffan

On 5 dec 2013, at 10:48, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <alexandre.iline at oracle.com> wrote:

> Staffan,
> 
> As it is not a test bug, could somebody else take ownership of it?
> 
> Shura
> 
> On 12/04/2013 01:36 PM, andrei.eremeev wrote:
>> Is is not a test bug.
>> Assign bug to someone from serviceability-dev and fix it.
>> 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2013-December/013459.html
>> 
>> Andrei
>> 
>> On 12/02/2013 09:10 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>> JDK-6498631 is closed a dup of JDK-8004127, so I don’t think you can
>>> close JDK-8004127.
>>> 
>>> /Staffan
>>> 
>>> On 29 nov 2013, at 13:18, andrei.eremeev <andrei.eremeev at oracle.com
>>> <mailto:andrei.eremeev at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I am analyzing this bug
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8004127>. And I think that
>>>> is is duplicate of JDK-6498631
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6498631>.
>>>> Test hangs in native code.
>>>> Can I close my bug as duplicate?
>>>> 
>>>> Andrei

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20131205/c43d1f4b/attachment.html