Integrated: 8256811: Delayed/missed jdwp class unloading events

[Zhengyu Gu]

On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:53:40 GMT, Zhengyu Gu <zgu at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Currently, jdi only check and process class unloading event when it detects a new GC cycle.
> 
> After [JDK-8212879](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8212879), posting class events can overlap with GC finish event, that results, sometimes, it only captures partial or even empty unloaded class list. The pending list usually can be flushed out at next GC cycle. But for the classes unloaded during the last GC cycle, the class unloading events may lost forever.
> 
> This patch checks and processes class unloading events unconditionally, suggested by @kbarrett, the last pending unloaded class list can be flushed by other events, such as `VM_DEATH`.
> 
> It also performs `commonRef_compact()` only when there are classes unloaded.
> 
> New test failed about 20% without patch, none with patch.
> 
> **Update**
> There are significant changes from early patch. 
> 
> The new approach:
> No longer removing dead objects and post events on VM thread. I believe it was implemented this way to workaround the following issues:
> - JDI event handler uses JVMTI raw monitor, it requires thread in `_in_native` state
> - The thread can not hold lock, which is needed to protect `JvmtiTagMap` while walking, when transition to `_in_native` state
> 
> The new solution breaks up into two steps:
> - Collect all dead object tags with lock
> - Transition to `_in_native` state and post object free events in one batch
> 
> This way, JDI event handler can process object free events upon arrivals without delay.
> 
> **Update 2**
> There is a comment for ` JvmtiTagMap::check_hashmap()` that states `ObjectFree` events are posted before heap walks.
> 
> // This checks for posting and rehashing before operations that
> // this tagmap table.  The calls from a JavaThread only rehash, posting is
> // only done before heap walks.
> void JvmtiTagMap::check_hashmap(bool post_events) {
> 
> Now, the events are actually posted after heap walks, but I don't think it makes any material material difference. 
> Even the events are posted earlier in old code, but they are only processed after next GC cycle.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 54854d93
Author:    Zhengyu Gu <zgu at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/54854d9300479c22c416fd9d2fdb5c29fc1884bc
Stats:     494 lines in 12 files changed: 253 ins; 149 del; 92 mod

8256811: Delayed/missed jdwp class unloading events

Co-authored-by: Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: cjplummer, coleenp, sspitsyn

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9168