<Sound Dev> RFR: 8250858 Address reliance on default constructors in the Java Sound APIs

Philip Race philip.race at oracle.com
Mon Aug 24 20:14:07 UTC 2020

OK .. approved .. although I would have preferred consistency.


On 8/24/20, 12:21 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> On 24.08.2020 11:49, Philip Race wrote:
>> Why is this not using the same text we settled on elsewhere for 
>> constructors of abstract classes ?
>> "Constructor for subclasses to call"
> This was the first review request, before we start to use it.
> And in the CSR comment, Joe said it is fine as well.

More information about the sound-dev mailing list