<Swing Dev> [PATCH] JDK-7169915 : Wrong display, when the document I18n properties is true.
Abossolo Foh Guy
guy.abossolo.foh at scientificware.com
Sun Feb 26 10:03:36 UTC 2017
Hello,
I insist.
I know there will be hard stress and busy days until next release but
could someone examins my patch and its test ?
Please.
Best regards.
With JDK9 build 158 :
When i18n enable, TableView layout wrong : Table width change when
inserts and removes caracters, see JDK-8158209 and JDK-7169915. Before
Table dx=0.0 After Table dx=28.0
When i18n disable, TableView layout wrong : Table width change when
inserts and removes caracters, see JDK-8158209 and JDK-7169915. Before
Table dx=0.0 After Table dx=28.0
-------- Message original --------
Objet: Re: <Swing Dev> [PATCH] JDK-7169915 : Swing Table Layout bad
repaint of the row [REGRESSION] JDK-8133864 : Wrong display, when the
document I18n properties is true.
Date: 2016-11-05 6:59
De: Abossolo Foh Guy <guy.abossolo.foh at scientificware.com>
À: Semyon Sadetsky
Hello,
I modified your
test(test/javax/swing/text/TableView/I18nLayoutTest.java) to simulate
user entries and removals as discribed in my bug reports JDK-7169915 and
JDK-7072926.
Rather than test the frame, I used four caret positions : one before,
one after the table, one in the first and one in the last line of the
table.
I also test i18n enable and i18n disable.
I think this test could replace the previous test I18nLayoutTest.java.
The test fails before and passes after my fix :
With JDK 8 current release (111) :
When i18n enable, test can't be completed : TableView layout wrong,
lines overlap, see JDK-8133864.
When i18n disable, TableView layout wrong : Table width change when
inserts and removes caracters, see JDK-8158209 and JDK-7169915. Before
Table dx=0.0 After Table dx=28.0
With JDK9 build 142 :
When i18n enable, TableView layout wrong : Table width change when
inserts and removes caracters, see JDK-8158209 and JDK-7169915. Before
Table dx=0.0 After Table dx=28.0
When i18n disable, TableView layout wrong : Table width change when
inserts and removes caracters, see JDK-8158209 and JDK-7169915. Before
Table dx=0.0 After Table dx=28.0
With JDK9 + fix :
ok
I used the latest JDK forest to build the fix and produce webrev.
This bug occurs only for user keyboard entries, if I use
JEditorPane.replaceSelection(...) the table layout is correct.
Best regards.
Guy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 2016-09-12 15:39, Semyon Sadetsky a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> The JDK-8133864 seems has no a regression. I found that your test
> works well after it (with corrections I described in JIRA for the
> table frame).
>
> If TableView layout is still an incorrect for you, please, attach a
> test that fails before and passes after your fix. Test is required for
> any JDK fixes and I didn't find in your webrev.
>
> --Semyon
>
>
> On 9/11/2016 11:34 AM, Abossolo Foh Guy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your great work.
>> But I'm agree and not agree with your conclusion about JDK-8158209 :
>> "Not an Issue".
>>
>> I'm agree :
>> I understand your recommendations about the height and the width for
>> the frame of the trView.
>> I never talked about this problem because frame painting hasn't being
>> a problem for me.
>>
>> I'm not agree :
>> I made a mistake in writing the bug JDK-8158209 report : two problems
>> in the same report.
>> But JDK-7169915 and JDK-7072926 are really a different problem you
>> solve in JDK-8158209.
>> In 2012, codebug.java was designed first for these bugs.
>> It is just an update problem, if you follow the steps discribe in
>> JDK-7169915 and JDK-7072926 and if you read the text\html\tableView
>> code you can understand my fix.
>> text\html\tableView works (not public) fine and \text\tableView
>> (public) works bad ? ? ? ?
>> As Victor, don't worry about this fix, I'd just compare the two codes
>> to built my fix.
>>
>> In attachment the documents asked by Alexandr about my fix.
>>
>> Yours faithfully.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Could you apply the fix to JDK 9 client repository ...
>> I applied the fix to JDK 9 client repository
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client :
>>
>> openjdk version "9-internal"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
>> 9-internal+0-2016-05-28-142420.scientificware2016.9devClient)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build
>> 9-internal+0-2016-05-28-142420.scientificware2016.9devClient, mixed
>> mode)
>>
>> The webrev and JTreport/JTWork are in attachment. All works fine,
>> except what is mentioned below.
>>
>>
>>> You mentioned that there are artifacts with a table displaying in JDK
>>> 9.
>> I can't say when it appeared because before your fix, the table size
>> didn't changed when we insert text and all the text stay on the same
>> line.
>> But, I have just notice that if, in the I18nLayoutTest.java, you
>> - change the line setUndecorated(true) to setUndecorated(false),
>> - run the program and enlarge the window 2 times larger than the text
>> size,
>> - all the text come back on the same line.
>> There no such artifacts when i18n is false.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Guy.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Le 2016-05-27 16:53, Alexandr Scherbatiy a écrit :
>>> The fix should be prepared for the JDK 9 first and only after that be
>>> backported to JDK 8u.
>>>
>>> Could you apply the fix to JDK 9 client repository
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client
>>> and send the webrev of the fix plus the test (see
>>> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/webrevHelp.html).
>>> The fix shouldn't contain comments with the old code lines. I
>>> believe
>>> that references to the bug number are also unnecessary for this case.
>>>
>>> You mentioned that there are artifacts with a table displaying in
>>> JDK
>>> 9. Do they appear only after fix of they also present even without
>>> the
>>> fix?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexandr.
>>>
>>> On 5/27/2016 9:23 AM, Abossolo Foh Guy wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please, please ... could someone examine the patch for JDK-8133864
>>>> that I suggested ? I really need it to implement matrix display in
>>>> my application. I've spent long time in 2012 to find what was wrong
>>>> in tableview. I know Victor's comment was not good but you could
>>>> compare with the tableview implementation in the swing/text/html
>>>> package which works fine.
>>>>
>>>> Beware, the display (with java 9 119) for I18nLayoutTest.java is not
>>>> the same with i18n true (bad) or i18n false (good). With i18n true
>>>> the table go down.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I built the recent OpenJDK8u and OpenJDK9 sources
>>>> (openjdk_versions.txt) with the patch shown in the output_diff.txt
>>>> attachment.
>>>>
>>>> I applied your patch for JDK-8133864 : Wrong display, when the
>>>> document I18n properties is true.
>>>> And I applied my patch for JDK-7169915 : Swing Table Layout bad
>>>> repaint of the row.
>>>>
>>>> All works fine in OpenJDK8u and the document is well displayed. The
>>>> table appears as I expected with all its lines and columns
>>>> (JDK-8133864 solved), size and borders included even if we write
>>>> some text inside (JDK-7169915 solved). I can modify it as I want.
>>>>
>>>> But with OpenJDK9, the display of the document is wrong. The table
>>>> appears as I expected with all its lines and columns (JDK-8133864
>>>> solved), size and borders included (JDK-7169915 solved) but the
>>>> entire document display is modified, the table is displayed on a new
>>>> line. And the document became unuseable, I can't modify it as I
>>>> want.
>>>>
>>>> This morning, I ran the same test programme (CodeBug.java in
>>>> attachment) with the Oracle JDK9 b114 (i.e. OpenJDK9 only with your
>>>> patch for JDK-8133864) : The table appears as I expected with all
>>>> its lines and columns (JDK-8133864 solved) but the size and borders
>>>> are bad repainted when we write some text inside (JDK-7169915
>>>> solved). And the document became unuseable too, I can't modify it as
>>>> I want.
>>>>
>>>> My conclusion :
>>>> 1- JDK-8133864 is solved with your PATCH.
>>>> 2- JDK-7169915 could be solved with my PATCH.
>>>> 3- There is regression between JDK8 and JDK9 may be in the Views
>>>> arrangement.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Could you apply the modification I suggested 4 years ago about the
>>>> Bug : JDK-7169915 : Swing Table Layout bad repaint of the row.
>>>>
>>>> The test case I had sent in 2012 is the same I used in : JDK-8133864
>>>> Wrong display, when the document I18n properties is true.
>>>>
>>>> A version of this test (called I18nLayoutTest.java) is now candidate
>>>> as part of tests for JDK 9 (/test/javax/swing/text/TableView/)
>>>>
>>>> Yours faithfully.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
--
Abossolo Foh Guy
71 rue Guy de Maupassant
69500 Bron
06 87 01 82 27
04 72 81 89 46
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tableview_webrev.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 115086 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20170226/95be34ca/tableview_webrev.zip>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TableViewLayoutTest.java.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 4170 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20170226/95be34ca/TableViewLayoutTest.java.zip>
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list