RFR: 8215477: [lworld] C2 should avoid value type allocations when inlining incrementally

Roland Westrelin rwestrel at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 15:50:45 UTC 2019

>> Right. But is igvn.remove_dead_node(n) better/different than pushing on
>> igvn worklist?
> It's more explicit and saves another round of igvn processing of the dead node (and other nodes that
> become dead as well).

Ok. I'll make that change.


More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list