RFR: 8234688 [lworld] Supporting volatile semantic for flattenable fields
david.simms at oracle.com
Mon Nov 25 09:27:21 UTC 2019
I'm good with the change, nice to add a test, thanks for that.
Just a small comment: we could probably allow for the flattening for
sizes that are naturally atomic for the H/W, i.e. x86_64 allows 64 bits
? (Assuming correct alignment for "Copy::conjoint_memory_atomic" to
On 22/11/19 10:31 PM, Frederic Parain wrote:
> Please review this small changeset to support volatile flattenable fields.
> The short term solution is to not flatten these fields.
> Thank you,
More information about the valhalla-dev