[Integrated] [lworld] RFR: 8244414: [lworld] Migrate Valhalla micro benchmarks suite to not use V? syntax

Srikanth Adayapalam sadayapalam at openjdk.java.net
Wed May 6 16:29:29 UTC 2020

On Wed, 6 May 2020 13:26:31 GMT, Srikanth Adayapalam <sadayapalam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Description of changes:
> Hi Maruizio,
>     Could you please review these assorted changes that block the build of Valhalla micro
> benchmarks ? This is a culumative fix for JDK-8244414 and JDK-8244458
>     You could skip a review of the benchmark source files themselves - these have only mechanical changes from V? to V.ref
>     except for one case where there was a usage of Node?<K,V> with Node actually being an identity class. We don't support
>     the transformed Node.ref<K,V> for identity classes, so I had to drop the '?'
> Problems fixed:
>     (i) Resolve.java: Diamond inference did not work for inline type constructors: Basically, the (static factory method
>     equivalent) constructors synthesized during diamond inference did not have their reference projection counterparts and
>     had to be paired up with them.
>     (ii) Types.java: LUB computation in the presence of mixed values and non-values should first apply widening conversion.
>     (iii) Enter.java: When we recompile files due to annotation processing rounds, discard
> any prior state carried on by the reference projection so as to keep it in sync with its peer.
> (A separate test will be added separately - for now building microbenchmarks is the test for this)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 72aa43eb
Author:    Srikanth Adayapalam <sadayapalam at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.java.net/valhalla/commit/72aa43eb
Stats:     313 lines in 36 files changed: 0 ins; 135 del; 178 mod

8244414: [lworld] Migrate Valhalla micro benchmarks suite to not use V? syntax

Reviewed-by: mcimadamore


PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/valhalla/pull/35

More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list