From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Tue Jul 12 13:50:13 2011 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:50:13 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository Message-ID: Hello! I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the get_sources script). Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? Thanks, Mario -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA? FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/ From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Jul 12 16:13:25 2011 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:13:25 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E1CD515.1030301@oracle.com> On 7/12/11 10:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix > the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not > officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the > get_sources script). > > Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? I don't think that it's in an OpenJDK repo (yet). Iris, do you know more? cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Tue Jul 12 17:13:59 2011 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:13:59 -0700 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository In-Reply-To: <4E1CD515.1030301@oracle.com> References: <4E1CD515.1030301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E1CE347.3070106@oracle.com> On 07/12/2011 04:13 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 7/12/11 10:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix >> the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not >> officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the >> get_sources script). >> >> Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? > I don't think that it's in an OpenJDK repo (yet). Iris, do you know more? > > cheers, > dalibor topic Dalibor, Currently, this is still in an internal repository. -- Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/web-discuss/attachments/20110712/5f680d83/attachment.html From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Jul 12 17:33:42 2011 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:33:42 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository In-Reply-To: <4E1CE347.3070106@oracle.com> References: <4E1CD515.1030301@oracle.com> <4E1CE347.3070106@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E1CE7E6.4060604@oracle.com> On 7/13/11 2:13 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > On 07/12/2011 04:13 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> On 7/12/11 10:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix >>> the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not >>> officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the >>> get_sources script). >>> >>> Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? >> I don't think that it's in an OpenJDK repo (yet). Iris, do you know more? >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic > > Dalibor, > > Currently, this is still in an internal repository. Thanks, Jon - Mario, if you have a patch, I'd be happy to pass it on for inclusion in the internal repository. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Tue Jul 12 22:57:26 2011 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (=?utf-8?B?bmV1Z2Vucy5saW1hc29mdHdhcmVAZ21haWwuY29t?=) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:57:26 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IE9wZW5KREsgb25saW5lIGd1aWRlIHNvdXJjZSByZXBvc2l0b3J5?= Message-ID: <4e1d33d2.c2c8e30a.121f.ffffea0d@mx.google.com> Is there any reason for it to be internal? Or better wordings, will we have access to that repository at some point? I guess it should be part of OpenJDK. Anyway, I'll send you a patch for the doc, should I base it on the clear text or on the html as displayed by the browser? Cheers, Mario -- Sent from HTC Desire... pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF http://www.icedrobot.org Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/ ----- Reply message ----- Da: "Dalibor Topic" Data: mer, lug 13, 2011 02:33 Oggetto: OpenJDK online guide source repository A: On 7/13/11 2:13 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > On 07/12/2011 04:13 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> On 7/12/11 10:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix >>> the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not >>> officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the >>> get_sources script). >>> >>> Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? >> I don't think that it's in an OpenJDK repo (yet). Iris, do you know more? >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic > > Dalibor, > > Currently, this is still in an internal repository. Thanks, Jon - Mario, if you have a patch, I'd be happy to pass it on for inclusion in the internal repository. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/web-discuss/attachments/20110713/06630c58/attachment.html From spoole at linux.vnet.ibm.com Tue Jul 12 23:21:01 2011 From: spoole at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Steve Poole) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:21:01 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository In-Reply-To: <4e1d33d2.c2c8e30a.121f.ffffea0d@mx.google.com> References: <4e1d33d2.c2c8e30a.121f.ffffea0d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4E1D394D.7050802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> On 13/07/11 06:57, neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com wrote: > Is there any reason for it to be internal? Or better wordings, will we > have access to that repository at some point? I guess it should be > part of OpenJDK. > Good question - I'd like to know the answer to that too. I'm sure it will happen but it would be good to know the timescales. > Anyway, I'll send you a patch for the doc, should I base it on the > clear text or on the html as displayed by the browser? > > Cheers, > Mario > -- > Sent from HTC Desire... > > pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF > Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF > > http://www.icedrobot.org > > Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ > Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org > OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ > > Please, support open standards: > http://endsoftpatents.org/ > > > ----- Reply message ----- > Da: "Dalibor Topic" > Data: mer, lug 13, 2011 02:33 > Oggetto: OpenJDK online guide source repository > A: > > On 7/13/11 2:13 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > On 07/12/2011 04:13 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> On 7/12/11 10:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > >>> Hello! > >>> > >>> I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix > >>> the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not > >>> officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the > >>> get_sources script). > >>> > >>> Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? > >> I don't think that it's in an OpenJDK repo (yet). Iris, do you know > more? > >> > >> cheers, > >> dalibor topic > > > > Dalibor, > > > > Currently, this is still in an internal repository. > > Thanks, Jon - Mario, if you have a patch, I'd be happy to pass it on for > inclusion in the internal repository. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador > Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192 > > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > > From kelly.ohair at oracle.com Wed Jul 13 09:08:23 2011 From: kelly.ohair at oracle.com (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:08:23 -0700 Subject: OpenJDK online guide source repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to amend the "code" of the web guide to OpenJDK to fix > the chapter that talks about the forest extension (forest is not > officially supported any longer, and has been replaced by the > get_sources script). Unfortunately, it's more than just changing fclone references to get_source.sh There are also references to fstatus, fupdate, ffetch, fpull, and fpush which are all Forest Extension commands. Which would need to change to just talk about one repository at a time, e.g. fetch, pull, and push. Or talk about using the ./make/scripts/hgforest.sh script that get_source.sh uses. I'd would rather hold off on all this, because we may have a better answer than this hgforest.sh script. > > Are there any pointers to the repository for this documentation? It is not openly available right now. -kto > > Thanks, > Mario > > -- > pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF > Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF > > IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org > Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ > Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org > OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ > > Please, support open standards: > http://endsoftpatents.org/ From philip.race at oracle.com Sat Jul 23 09:16:02 2011 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:16:02 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) Message-ID: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 -phil. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 From: Mario Torre To: Phil Race CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net 2011/7/23 Phil Race: > Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. > > -phil. > Hello Phil, Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. Cheers, Mario -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/ From Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de Sat Jul 23 13:19:55 2011 From: Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de (Ulf Zibis) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:19:55 +0200 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E2B2CEB.30609@gmx.de> Hi, couldn't you use ReflectiveOperationException instead? Additionally you could better profit from generics: public static synchronized RenderingEngine getInstance() { if (reImpl == null) { reImpl = AccessController.doPrivileged( new PrivilegedAction() { public RenderingEngine run() { String reClass = System.getProperty("sun.java2d.renderer"); if ("sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine".equals(reClass)) { try { return (RenderingEngine)Class.forName(reClass).newInstance(); } catch (ReflectiveOperationException ignored) { } // not found } for (RenderingEngine re : ServiceLoader.loadInstalled( RenderingEngine.class)) { if (re.getClass().getName().equals(reClass)) { return re; } } return null; } }); if (reImpl == null) { throw new InternalError("No RenderingEngine module found"); } if(AccessController.doPrivileged(new GetPropertyAction( "sun.java2d.renderer.trace")) != null) { reImpl = new Tracer(reImpl); } } return reImpl; } And again more simple just use (no need for try...catch): public RenderingEngine run() { String reClass = System.getProperty("sun.java2d.renderer"); if ("sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine".equals(reClass)) { return new sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine(); } for (RenderingEngine re : ServiceLoader.loadInstalled( RenderingEngine.class)) { if (re.getClass().getName().equals(reClass)) { return re; } } return null; } -Ulf Am 23.07.2011 18:16, schrieb Phil Race: > Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 > > -phil. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 > From: Mario Torre > To: Phil Race > CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net > > > > 2011/7/23 Phil Race: >> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. >> >> -phil. >> > > Hello Phil, > > Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 > > I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. > > Cheers, > Mario From David.Holmes at oracle.com Sun Jul 24 19:21:38 2011 From: David.Holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:21:38 +1000 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> Phil Race said the following on 07/24/11 02:16: > Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 bugs.openjdk is not a general purpose bug reporting system. As it still states there: "During the initial rollout phase, this site will only be accepting and tracking patch contributions to the OpenJDK 6 and 7 forests. Until the remainder of the site is ready, please continue to file normal bug reports via http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp. Regular bug reports filed here during the rollout period will be summarily closed. " --- we never went past "initial rollout phase". Now that 7 is almost out the door and 8 is underway I would suggest making bugs.openjdk read-only. David > -phil. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 > From: Mario Torre > To: Phil Race > CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net > > > > 2011/7/23 Phil Race: >> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. >> >> -phil. >> > > Hello Phil, > > Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 > > I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. > > Cheers, > Mario From philip.race at oracle.com Sun Jul 24 20:06:37 2011 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:06:37 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E2CDDBD.5030602@oracle.com> I think that was overly specific because JDK8 was in an unimagineable future. I'm sure JDK 8 is included until there's something else, presumably better. Note that this was a patch, not a bug, per the guidelines. -phil. On 7/24/11 7:21 PM, David Holmes wrote: > Phil Race said the following on 07/24/11 02:16: >> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 > > bugs.openjdk is not a general purpose bug reporting system. As it > still states there: > > "During the initial rollout phase, this site will only be accepting > and tracking patch contributions to the OpenJDK 6 and 7 forests. Until > the remainder of the site is ready, please continue to file normal bug > reports via http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp. > > Regular bug reports filed here during the rollout period will be > summarily closed. " > > --- > > we never went past "initial rollout phase". > > Now that 7 is almost out the door and 8 is underway I would suggest > making bugs.openjdk read-only. > > David > >> -phil. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) >> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 >> From: Mario Torre >> To: Phil Race >> CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net >> >> >> >> 2011/7/23 Phil Race: >>> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. >>> >>> -phil. >>> >> >> Hello Phil, >> >> Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 >> >> I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. >> >> Cheers, >> Mario From bradford.wetmore at oracle.com Sun Jul 24 20:45:05 2011 From: bradford.wetmore at oracle.com (Bradford Wetmore) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:45:05 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2CDDBD.5030602@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> <4E2CDDBD.5030602@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E2CE6C1.2070705@oracle.com> I'll add it ASAP. Brad On 7/24/2011 8:06 PM, Phil Race wrote: > I think that was overly specific because JDK8 was in an unimagineable > future. > I'm sure JDK 8 is included until there's something else, presumably better. > > Note that this was a patch, not a bug, per the guidelines. > > -phil. > > On 7/24/11 7:21 PM, David Holmes wrote: >> Phil Race said the following on 07/24/11 02:16: >>> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 >> >> bugs.openjdk is not a general purpose bug reporting system. As it >> still states there: >> >> "During the initial rollout phase, this site will only be accepting >> and tracking patch contributions to the OpenJDK 6 and 7 forests. Until >> the remainder of the site is ready, please continue to file normal bug >> reports via http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp. >> >> Regular bug reports filed here during the rollout period will be >> summarily closed. " >> >> --- >> >> we never went past "initial rollout phase". >> >> Now that 7 is almost out the door and 8 is underway I would suggest >> making bugs.openjdk read-only. >> >> David >> >>> -phil. >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) >>> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 >>> From: Mario Torre >>> To: Phil Race >>> CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net >>> >>> >>> >>> 2011/7/23 Phil Race: >>>> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. >>>> >>>> -phil. >>>> >>> >>> Hello Phil, >>> >>> Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195: >>> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 >>> >>> I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Mario > From bradford.wetmore at oracle.com Mon Jul 25 17:49:47 2011 From: bradford.wetmore at oracle.com (Brad Wetmore) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:49:47 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2CE6C1.2070705@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> <4E2CDDBD.5030602@oracle.com> <4E2CE6C1.2070705@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4E2E0F2B.8060505@oracle.com> I added JDK8 to the bugs.o.j.n, and moved 100195 to that release. I'll leave it to the experts as to whether this is a patch or a bug report. Looks like the latter to me, which is just fine. As a quick reminder, please ensure sure the submitter has signed the SCA/OCA. Looks like it's already been added to bugster. http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7070155 Brad On 7/24/2011 8:45 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > I'll add it ASAP. > > Brad > > > > On 7/24/2011 8:06 PM, Phil Race wrote: >> I think that was overly specific because JDK8 was in an unimagineable >> future. >> I'm sure JDK 8 is included until there's something else, presumably >> better. >> >> Note that this was a patch, not a bug, per the guidelines. >> >> -phil. >> >> On 7/24/11 7:21 PM, David Holmes wrote: >>> Phil Race said the following on 07/24/11 02:16: >>>> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8 >>> >>> bugs.openjdk is not a general purpose bug reporting system. As it >>> still states there: >>> >>> "During the initial rollout phase, this site will only be accepting >>> and tracking patch contributions to the OpenJDK 6 and 7 forests. Until >>> the remainder of the site is ready, please continue to file normal bug >>> reports via http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp. >>> >>> Regular bug reports filed here during the rollout period will be >>> summarily closed. " >>> >>> --- >>> >>> we never went past "initial rollout phase". >>> >>> Now that 7 is almost out the door and 8 is underway I would suggest >>> making bugs.openjdk read-only. >>> >>> David >>> >>>> -phil. >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) >>>> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200 >>>> From: Mario Torre >>>> To: Phil Race >>>> CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/7/23 Phil Race: >>>>> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id. >>>>> >>>>> -phil. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hello Phil, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is >>>> 100195: >>>> >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195 >>>> >>>> I could not set the target release as JDK8, though. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Mario >> From fw at deneb.enyo.de Mon Jul 25 23:05:16 2011 From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:05:16 +0200 Subject: Wiki spam issues Message-ID: <87ei1dpof7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Apparently, the anti-spam measures on the wiki have ceased to work, particularly in the comments. Here are a few examples: From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Tue Jul 26 09:24:33 2011 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:24:33 +0200 Subject: Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :) In-Reply-To: <4E2E0F2B.8060505@oracle.com> References: <4E2AF3C2.5060609@oracle.com> <4E2CD332.4070604@oracle.com> <4E2CDDBD.5030602@oracle.com> <4E2CE6C1.2070705@oracle.com> <4E2E0F2B.8060505@oracle.com> Message-ID: 2011/7/26 Brad Wetmore : > I added JDK8 to the bugs.o.j.n, and moved 100195 to that release. ?I'll > leave it to the experts as to whether this is a patch or a bug report. Looks > like the latter to me, which is just fine. > > As a quick reminder, please ensure sure the submitter has signed the > SCA/OCA. Hello Brad, I signed the SCA, I believe it's still in place, but if I need to sign something else, just tell me. > Looks like it's already been added to bugster. > > ? ?http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7070155 Yeah, I did so. @Phil, is the patch ok to commit? I updated the webrev here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/7070155/webrev.01/ Cheers, Mario -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA? FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/