Question about non-integrated patches

[Alex Kashchenko]

Hi,

I've been looking through the patches that are applied (or should be 
applied) to jdk8u during the testing of the Fedora package. And found 
three patches, that have been posted to list some time ago (month+), but 
haven't been integrated:

  - 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-February/000090.html
  - 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-March/000183.html
  - 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-May/000275.html

May someone comment on these patches? I am not looking for the immediate 
decision for their integration, rather whether they are still actual (so 
may be integrated later) or not (so should be dropped from testing).

I currently have quite stable process for jdk8u RPM builds and want to 
setup a similar process for jdk9 (with a minimal RPM wrapper that will 
allow to use Fedora builds) to keep jdk9 in sync with jdk8u, and want to 
have a clean list of jdk8u patches to start with.

-- 
-Alex