Question about non-integrated patches

[Sergey Nazarkin]

I’ve used Mingliang’s  patch [1]  to support FPU-less cores (activity is ongoing). 

The other two patches are verified by daily use of  Azul builds. 


Sergey Nazarkin




> On 09 Jun 2016, at 16:56, Alex Kashchenko <akashche at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've been looking through the patches that are applied (or should be applied) to jdk8u during the testing of the Fedora package. And found three patches, that have been posted to list some time ago (month+), but haven't been integrated:
> 
> - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-February/000090.html
> - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-March/000183.html
> - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-May/000275.html
> 
> May someone comment on these patches? I am not looking for the immediate decision for their integration, rather whether they are still actual (so may be integrated later) or not (so should be dropped from testing).
> 
> I currently have quite stable process for jdk8u RPM builds and want to setup a similar process for jdk9 (with a minimal RPM wrapper that will allow to use Fedora builds) to keep jdk9 in sync with jdk8u, and want to have a clean list of jdk8u patches to start with.
> 
> -- 
> -Alex