[RFR] jdk9.0.4+12 + functionality

Andrey Petushkov andrey.petushkov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 09:04:45 UTC 2018


The purpose of http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9.0.4%2b12/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9.0.4+12/> is yes, only
to bump to 9.0.4+12 baseline, nothing more. And yes, I've presumed if I
manage to get a better patch I'll present it in some form like that, not
the 2G webrev
Anyway, let me sort the update thing out, I still don't get it whether it's
my fault or somebody has done something nasty in upstream..

Andrey

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:55 AM Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 07:42 +0000, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > That was http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch32-port/jdk9/
> > Indeed you're right but I have no idea why that has happened, I just
> > pulled from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u/ and merged.
> > Both went flawlessly. I'll redo the operation and check if the
> > problem persists. (And sorry, I just don't want to run webrev again,
> > it took about 2 days to complete!)
>
> Is the only effect of this patch to update the jdk9 tree to the current
> state of jdk9u (ie http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u)?
>
> If so there really is no need to generate these humongous changesets! A
> simple log of the changesets to be applied would be sufficient.
>
> For review purposes the only changesets that are necessary are any
> changes that you have to make manually to resolve any conflicts in the
> merge.
>
> All the best,
> Ed.
>
>


More information about the aarch32-port-dev mailing list