Latest build tags, naming convention changed?

Andrew Leonard anleonar at redhat.com
Wed Sep 4 13:10:45 UTC 2024


Did we intend to remove the "-" in the latest tag names?
    jdk8u432-b03-aarch3220240830
    jdk8u432-b02-aarch3220240830
    jdk8u432-b01-aarch3220240830

as opposed to : jdk8u432-b03-aarch32-20240830  ??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/attachments/20240904/8b27f46e/attachment.htm>


More information about the aarch32-port-dev mailing list