Latest build tags, naming convention changed?
Sergey Nazarkin
snazarkin at azul.com
Wed Sep 4 14:09:16 UTC 2024
Oops, I’m sorry, my fault, I’ll retag it again. Thank you for noticing
On 4 Sep 2024, at 16:10, Andrew Leonard <anleonar at redhat.com> wrote:
Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Did we intend to remove the "-" in the latest tag names?
jdk8u432-b03-aarch3220240830
jdk8u432-b02-aarch3220240830
jdk8u432-b01-aarch3220240830
as opposed to : jdk8u432-b03-aarch32-20240830 ??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/attachments/20240904/d3a03db9/attachment.htm>
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list