Latest build tags, naming convention changed?

[Andrew Leonard]

No worries. thank you for fixing Sergey


On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:11 PM Sergey Nazarkin <snazarkin at azul.com> wrote:

> Oops, I’m sorry, my fault, I’ll retag it again. Thank you for noticing
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2024, at 16:10, Andrew Leonard <anleonar at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Did we intend to remove the "-" in the latest tag names?
>     jdk8u432-b03-aarch3220240830
>     jdk8u432-b02-aarch3220240830
>     jdk8u432-b01-aarch3220240830
>
> as opposed to : jdk8u432-b03-aarch32-20240830  ??
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/attachments/20240904/8cf98e39/attachment-0001.htm>