[aarch64-port-dev ] Whether or not to revert of checkcast_arraycopy stub to generate return value expected by generic C2 code

[Andrew Dinn]

On 15/10/13 16:32, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:22 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>> Hmm, yes but I did borrow the counting up from negative from the Intel
>> code and also ended up adding code to the zero, success, fail cases that
>> is merged in your original. Here's a proper rewrite based more closely
>> on your code which avoids a lot of the redundancy in my original
>> version. It really just adds the save of the original count and the
>> compute of -1^K so the extra cost is minimal.
> 
> That looks right.

Ok, I'll check this in.


regards,


Andrew Dinn
-----------