[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 88158361: AArch64: Address calculation missed optimizations

[Andrew Haley]

On 16/06/17 05:40, Zhongwei Yao wrote:
> By the way, the counterpart sub extension rule (like SubExtL_sxtw_imm) is
> also missing. And moreover, other add/sub extension rules (like
> AddExtL_uxtb_and_shift, AddExtL_uxth_and_shift etc.) are also missing. But
> these rules are not hit at all in my real world benchmark tests. I feel
> they are too specific to be matched. So I do not include them in my patch.

It looks like these are cases which are missing from the patterns
generated by the macros in aarch64_ad.m4.  It would be better if you
added them all there.

Thanks.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671