[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8215202: AArch64: jtreg test test/jdk/sun/nio/cs/FindEncoderBugs.java fails
Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China)
Nick.Gasson at arm.com
Fri Dec 28 03:49:45 UTC 2018
Sorry I just found it in jdk/jdk12, please ignore. Thanks Andrew!
Nick
On 28/12/2018 11:35, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> Hi Andrew / Dmitrij,
>
> Is there anything else you want me to do with this one before it can be
> committed?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On 12/12/2018 09:13, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>>> One thing: is randomChar() fully reproducible? That is to say, are
>>> we sure that we always run the same tests?
>>
>> It uses jdk.test.lib.RandomFactory which seeds the RNG from the "seed"
>> system property. So if this is set when running jtreg the results are
>> fully reproducible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
>>> Sent: 12 December 2018 00:23
>>> To: Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) <Nick.Gasson at arm.com>; hotspot-
>>> compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> Cc: nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; nd <nd at arm.com>; aarch64-port-
>>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8215202: AArch64: jtreg test
>>> test/jdk/sun/nio/cs/FindEncoderBugs.java fails
>>>
>>> Good catch, again.
>>>
>>> On 12/11/18 8:05 AM, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>>>> Also Extended the FindEncoderBugs test so that it hits all cases in
>>>> the intrinsic assembly. Currently only the final NEXT_1 section is
>>>> covered by this test.
>>>
>>> One thing: is randomChar() fully reproducible? That is to say, are
>>> we sure that we always run the same tests?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Haley
>>> Java Platform Lead Engineer
>>> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
>>> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list