[aarch64-port-dev ] Fwd: 8u-aarch64 : Backport 8163363: AArch64: Stack size in tools/launcher/Settings.java needs to be adjusted

Aleksey Shipilev shade at redhat.com
Tue Aug 6 17:29:56 UTC 2019


On 8/6/19 6:48 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> On 06/08/2019 17:35, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 8/6/19 10:49 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>> The backport requires a minor tweak to the original patch as per the
>>> following webrev:
>>>
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adinn/8163363-jdk8u/webrev.00/
>>
>> *) I don't understand, why "ppc64le" case was added?
>>
>>   78         if (getArch().equals("ppc64") || getArch().equals("ppc64le")) {
> 
> That is because I back-ported the original patch and it was included in
> that patch and went in automatically. Is ppc64le not a thing in jdk8u?
> If so I can remove it.

It is not in the 8u code, backport should not add it.

>> *) Original change has this comment, are we ignoring it?
>>
>>  // Check the stack size logs printed by -XshowSettings to verify -Xss meaningfully.
> 
> That comment was not in the jdk8u code but was in a part of the original
> change set that conflicted with the jdk8u code. So, i omitted to copy it
> in when I manually reconciled the code. I will restore it if you want.

I think we better backport the changeset exactly, i.e. with the comment. Please put it in.

> Does jdk8u-shenandoah demand a jdk8u-fix-request/yes dance? Or can I
> just push?
jdk8u-shenandoah is outside JDK Updates process, you can push after this RFR is acked.

-- 
Thanks,
-Aleksey



More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list