[rfc] jtreg's jenkins out of sync?

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 10:59:46 UTC 2015


Hmm,

I think Mani did see that change set in there, Mani?

Cheers,
Martijn

On 20 April 2015 at 11:13, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/20/2015 10:45 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>> Mercurial sometimes gets out of synch/date.  It usually resolves itself
>> on the next change set.
>>
>>
> Sorry again.
>
>
> I have checked the built jars and worksapces. The last chngeset is still
> missing...
>
> I feel little bit bad about that. But that hg out of sync is quite
> strong...
>
> J.
>
>  Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 20 April 2015 at 09:27, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:
>> jvanek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 04/19/2015 08:07 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         For those wondering, this resolved itself.
>>
>>
>>     ok. I did:)
>>
>>     How did it resolved itself?
>>
>>
>>         Cheers,
>>         Martijn
>>
>>
>>
>>     The build Mani started  already had my deeply wonted change.
>>
>>     But I think the question is still in place - Why build, initiated by
>> change 156 in repo was based on changeset 155...
>>
>>     I do not mean ti somehow wrongly, But seems wrong to me.
>>
>>
>>     Thanx!
>>
>>     J.
>>
>>
>>         On 17 April 2015 at 18:09, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:
>> jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>              Hi!
>>
>>              Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that jenkins is not
>> pulling latest changesets as expected:
>>
>>              Look to the:
>>         https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/
>>              It is now latest build. It clearly says that it was started
>> by scm change, last change is the jdk.version.major bla bla bal...
>>
>>              But - download the jar and you will find my changeset
>> missing.
>>              Looking to the output:
>> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/consoleText
>>
>>              It clearly says:
>>              $ hg clone --rev default --noupdate
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg
>> /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
>>              adding changesets
>>              adding manifests
>>              adding file changes
>>              added 157 changesets with 1542 changes to 650 files
>>              [jtreg] $ hg update --rev default
>>              623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files
>> unresolved
>>              [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {node}
>>              [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {rev}
>>              [jtreg] $ hg log --rev
>> e88738b571dee0fb28e40ef14260b78fa267e4f3
>>              changeset:   155:e88738b571de
>>              user:        jjg
>>              date:        Mon Mar 30 17:56:11 2015 -0700
>>              summary:     Improved asmtools handling
>>
>>
>>              Which is the my_comit-1. And is Also a bit surprising.
>> Because my Changeset had id 156. The clone cloned 157 chnagesets but as tip
>> was used 155.
>>
>>              So maybe there is -2 instead -1 somewhere :))
>>
>>              Nope, joking... If you may fix/reschedule whatever I will be
>> glad. I do not wont to upload on my machines my self built version.
>>
>>
>>              TY and sorry if I'm wrong...
>>
>>              J.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the adoption-discuss mailing list