[rfc] jtreg's jenkins out of sync?

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Apr 20 11:26:33 UTC 2015


On 04/20/2015 12:59 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> I think Mani did see that change set in there, Mani?

I thought so. It is correctly in hg log of build.

But Nope. Non of the build s sine /265/ do not have it.
Most surprising is, that also workspace (accessible via webgui) is missing this changeset.


J.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 20 April 2015 at 11:13, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 04/20/2015 10:45 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>         Mercurial sometimes gets out of synch/date.  It usually resolves itself on the next change set.
>
>
>     Sorry again.
>
>
>     I have checked the built jars and worksapces. The last chngeset is still missing...
>
>     I feel little bit bad about that. But that hg out of sync is quite strong...
>
>     J.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Martijn
>
>         On 20 April 2015 at 09:27, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>
>              On 04/19/2015 08:07 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>                  Hi all,
>
>                  For those wondering, this resolved itself.
>
>
>              ok. I did:)
>
>              How did it resolved itself?
>
>
>                  Cheers,
>                  Martijn
>
>
>
>              The build Mani started  already had my deeply wonted change.
>
>              But I think the question is still in place - Why build, initiated by change 156 in repo was based on changeset 155...
>
>              I do not mean ti somehow wrongly, But seems wrong to me.
>
>
>              Thanx!
>
>              J.
>
>
>                  On 17 April 2015 at 18:09, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>>> wrote:
>
>
>                       Hi!
>
>                       Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that jenkins is not pulling latest changesets as expected:
>
>                       Look to the:
>         https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/
>                       It is now latest build. It clearly says that it was started by scm change, last change is the jdk.version.major bla bla bal...
>
>                       But - download the jar and you will find my changeset missing.
>                       Looking to the output: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/consoleText
>
>                       It clearly says:
>                       $ hg clone --rev default --noupdate http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
>                       adding changesets
>                       adding manifests
>                       adding file changes
>                       added 157 changesets with 1542 changes to 650 files
>                       [jtreg] $ hg update --rev default
>                       623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>                       [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {node}
>                       [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {rev}
>                       [jtreg] $ hg log --rev e88738b571dee0fb28e40ef14260b78fa267e4f3
>                       changeset:   155:e88738b571de
>                       user:        jjg
>                       date:        Mon Mar 30 17:56:11 2015 -0700
>                       summary:     Improved asmtools handling
>
>
>                       Which is the my_comit-1. And is Also a bit surprising. Because my Changeset had id 156. The clone cloned 157 chnagesets but as tip was used 155.
>
>                       So maybe there is -2 instead -1 somewhere :))
>
>                       Nope, joking... If you may fix/reschedule whatever I will be glad. I do not wont to upload on my machines my self built version.
>
>
>                       TY and sorry if I'm wrong...
>
>                       J.
>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the adoption-discuss mailing list