adoption-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 1

[Martijn Verburg]

Hi Bruno,

Have you signed the OCA?  Assuming you have then you can:

See https://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ for the typical steps to take, but
in short.

1.) Clone a local copy of hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk
2.) Pick one of the red items in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/doccheck/jdk-by-module/index.html, and post
a message on the jdk-dev mailing list saying you're going to fix and if
there's anything extra you should know about before starting.
3.) Submit a patch to the mailing list and ask for a sponsor

Cheers,
Martijn







Cheers,
Martijn


On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 09:54, Bruno Oliveira <olivbruno8 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to fix/have a look at this issue:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/doccheck/jdk-by-module/java.net.http/report.html
>
> How can I see/work on this?
>
> Best regards,
> Bruno
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM <adoption-discuss-request at openjdk.java.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Send adoption-discuss mailing list submissions to
> >         adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/adoption-discuss
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         adoption-discuss-request at openjdk.java.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         adoption-discuss-owner at openjdk.java.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of adoption-discuss digest..."
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Fwd: Cleaning up JDK docs: progress. (Martijn Verburg)
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> > To: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" <
> adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
> > >
> > Cc:
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 17:47:32 +0000
> > Subject: Fwd: Cleaning up JDK docs: progress.
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a great area where you can assist as a new contributor.  Head on
> > over to the jdk-dev mailing list and offer to tackle some of the broken
> > Javadoc.  If you follow the links below you can see the packages that
> > require the most work.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 23:33
> > Subject: Cleaning up JDK docs: progress.
> > To: jdk-dev <jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> >
> >
> > As many of you may be aware, there's being an ongoing campaign over the
> > past few JDK releases to "clean up" the documentation for the JDK API
> > and related specs, initially focusing on bad HTML, and more recently
> > focusing on broken links, both internal and external.
> >
> > Although the work is not yet complete, we have been making great
> > progress: most documentation for most modules is mostly OK. I've posted
> > some reports, broken down by module [1] and for all the docs together
> [2].
> >
> > The reports are generated by a new tool "doccheck" that should be
> > "coming soon" to the Code Tools project [3]. The intent of the tool is
> > to provide easy and fast checking for various issues that have been
> > found in the documentation, such as bad HTML, broken links, etc., and to
> > provide easy-to-read summaries of the problems that are found.
> >
> > Thanks to all who have been involved in this cleanup effort, whether it
> > has been fixing issues in the docs or docs infrastructure, or reviewing
> > changesets.
> >
> > -- Jon
> >
> > [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/doccheck/jdk-by-module/index.html
> > [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/doccheck/jdk-all/report.html
> > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/
> >
> >
>