RFR: CSR for Compiler implementation for records

[Vicente Romero]

Hi Alex,

Thanks for your comments, I have modified the CSR, does it look better now?

Thanks,
Vicente

On 11/4/19 2:26 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
> Usually, I want a CSR's Solution to break down the new language 
> feature -- for example, see the original CSR for switch expressions 
> JDK-8207241, where the Solution sketches the actual changes, not just 
> "allow switch as an expression kthxbai". However, in the case of 
> record classes, the Solution is legitimately self-contained -- support 
> record classes! -- so no need for a break-down. That said, the phrase 
> "for a fixed set of values" is confusing because it suggests enum-like 
> behavior (the same phrase in the Summary is not confusing because it 
> has a qualifier). Also "Add records classes".
>
> Alex
>
> On 11/3/2019 9:13 AM, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the draft of the CSR for Compiler implementation for 
>> records at [1]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vicente
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233433