"case catch" instead of "case throws"?

[Pedro Lamarão]

I also read it as "(in) case (it) throws".

Em seg., 19 de fev. de 2024 às 11:44, Holo The Sage Wolf <holo3146 at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> The branch catches a case of throws
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, 16:18 Patrick Doyle, <p.r.doyle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In Brian's "Uniform handling of failure in switch", he proposes the
>> syntax "case throws". I see the motivation (it certainly reads nicely) but
>> since such clauses are catching exceptions, wouldn't it be more in line
>> with the rest of the language to use "case catch"?
>>
>> This would also serve to preserve the word "throws" for its usual purpose
>> if ever "switch ... throws" becomes a thing.
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Doyle
>> p.r.doyle at gmail.com
>>
>
-- 
Pedro Lamarão
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20240219/14e48e1e/attachment.htm>