Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

[Vicente Romero]

Hi Remi,

In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of 
the Record attribute at [1].

Thanks,
Vicente

[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225058

On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
>
> The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, is there a reason ?
>
> Rémi
> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359