Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

[forax at univ-mlv.fr]

Thank Vicente,
I suppose you also have visible and invisible annotations as attribute too ?

Rémi

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Vicente Romero" <vicente.romero at oracle.com>
> À: "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr>, "amber-spec-experts" <amber-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 4 Octobre 2019 23:33:27
> Objet: Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

> Hi Remi,
> 
> In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of
> the Record attribute at [1].
> 
> Thanks,
> Vicente
> 
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225058
> 
> On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an
>> experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
>>
>> The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, is
>> there a reason ?
>>
>> Rémi
> > [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359