<AWT Dev> [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces

[Artem Ananiev]

Hi, Roman,

the issue with SCA/OpenJDK user names (see email below) is resolved, so 
you can push your changes into awt-gate workspace. Note, we decided to 
push the docs change in a separate patch (and it is still in progress, 
as far as I see).

Thanks,

Artem

Artem Ananiev wrote:
> 
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2008/9/19 Artem Ananiev <Artem.Ananiev at sun.com>:
>>> Hi, Roman,
>>>
>>> I don't see you in the list of people who signed SCA. Your company - 
>>> "aicas
>>> GmbH" - only has two members "iproetel" and "rabbit78", which is 
>>> probably
>>> due to our SCA list is incomplete, but this should be checked first. 
>>> Have
>>> you signed SCA? If yes, please, let us take a day or two to resolve this
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> From the technical point of view you first need to synchronize your 
>>> OpenJDK
>>> workspace with AWT one, because we had a number of fixes there which 
>>> are not
>>> integrated into the master workspace yet.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Artem
>>>
>>> Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I'm fine with that patch. Approved.
>>>> Cool. So should I commit and push this patch (minus the MComponentPeer
>>>> thing) to the awt-gate? Or do I have to wait for another OK? Does my
>>>> (SSH-level) permission to push to the Cacio-Repos also extend to the
>>>> other gates automatically? Also, I probably need some guidance with the
>>>> exact commit message.
>>>>
>>>> /Roman
>>>>
>>
>> I believe rabbit78 is one of Roman's pseudonyms.
> 
> Oh, I see... Now I need to find out why his OpenJDK username (rkennke) 
> differs from SCA signature name rabbit78, and if this may be a problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artem