<AWT Dev> [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces

[Andrei V. Dmitriev]

Artem Ananiev wrote:
> Hi, Roman,
> 
> the issue with SCA/OpenJDK user names (see email below) is resolved, so 
> you can push your changes into awt-gate workspace. Note, we decided to 
> push the docs change in a separate patch (and it is still in progress, 
> as far as I see).
Confirmed!

And GL, Roman! :)
   Andrei

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artem
> 
> Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2008/9/19 Artem Ananiev <Artem.Ananiev at sun.com>:
>>>> Hi, Roman,
>>>>
>>>> I don't see you in the list of people who signed SCA. Your company - 
>>>> "aicas
>>>> GmbH" - only has two members "iproetel" and "rabbit78", which is 
>>>> probably
>>>> due to our SCA list is incomplete, but this should be checked first. 
>>>> Have
>>>> you signed SCA? If yes, please, let us take a day or two to resolve 
>>>> this
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> From the technical point of view you first need to synchronize your 
>>>> OpenJDK
>>>> workspace with AWT one, because we had a number of fixes there which 
>>>> are not
>>>> integrated into the master workspace yet.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Artem
>>>>
>>>> Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, I'm fine with that patch. Approved.
>>>>> Cool. So should I commit and push this patch (minus the MComponentPeer
>>>>> thing) to the awt-gate? Or do I have to wait for another OK? Does my
>>>>> (SSH-level) permission to push to the Cacio-Repos also extend to the
>>>>> other gates automatically? Also, I probably need some guidance with 
>>>>> the
>>>>> exact commit message.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Roman
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe rabbit78 is one of Roman's pseudonyms.
>>
>> Oh, I see... Now I need to find out why his OpenJDK username (rkennke) 
>> differs from SCA signature name rabbit78, and if this may be a problem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Artem